AI Rate Professor

Art

Michael Burns

ART120 · ART200 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are unusually independent and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSevere frustrationHarsh gradingUnclear feedbackVery difficult testsStrong avoid signals
  • Students describe Michael Burns in strongly negative terms and repeatedly advise avoiding the class.
  • The course appears extremely difficult, with and .
  • Tests and exams as out of control and grading as unpredictable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears extremely hard because and maximum difficulty.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course feels extremely difficult because students describe out-of-control tests, frustration, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because they describe the class as frustrating, boring, harsh, and unfair.

Recommendation and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Grading appears harsh and unpredictable because a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload details are limited, but the class feels heavy because students , and harsh project outcomes.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the student burden.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Teaching experience is very poor because all reviews describe boredom, frustration, harshness, and strong avoidance advice.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessments appear to include both tests and projects, with both described negatively.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, emphasizing , and poor student experience.

Main concern

The main concern is severe frustration caused , and .

What students said

“BY FAR THE !”
ART200
“He will tell you you are doing great and not to change a thing and then give you an F on the project.”
ART120
“STAY AWAY!!!”
ART120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review says the tests are out of control, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book format.

Very Difficult Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Very Difficult Tests
“ .”
ART200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“STAY AWAY!!!”

⚖️

5/100

“He will tell you you are doing great and not to change a thing and then give you an F on the project.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“BY FAR THE !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • BY FAR THE !
  • EVERYTHING WAS SO BORING AND BLAH.
  • HE HAS NO SENSE OF HUMOR WHAT-SO-EVER.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • He will tell you you are doing great and not to change a thing and then give you an F on the project.
  • unless you want to be extremely frusturated and irritated

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !
  • STAY AWAY!!!
  • i would not take this class or any class by this instructor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three older reviews, but their negative tone is highly consistent and specific.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1202 reviews
ART2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values