AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shannon Condon

MATH280 · MATH160 · MATH1463 · MATH60160 · MAATH160 · MAT160 · MATH110 · MATH1609577 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
29.27%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you can , and a large weekly workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadHarsh gradingConfusing instructionTest heavyMixed older praise
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about excessive modules, packets, and .
  • as harsh, even when some grades are high.
  • A smaller group of older reviews praises her as caring and helpful, but the dominant recent tone is avoidant.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but most describe , and high stress as the real cost.

Both formats report hard work, while online reviews stress module volume and in-person reviews stress packets and grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content is made harder by fast or , and limited direct instruction.

Online students struggle with long modules, while , and hard-to-follow lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Several in-person reviews say attendance matters or missing class can cause serious consequences.

; online flexibility is limited by heavy weekly deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most because the , and teaching style feel stressful and unclear.

Both formats are mostly negative, though online has a few students who found the course clear and manageable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students call her a tough or and describe losing major credit for small mistakes.

Format shift

Online and reviews adding plagiarism and conduct concerns.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students repeatedly report 20-40 assignments, long modules, packets, and many hours of weekly work.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly modules and assignment counts, while and group work.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Positive older reviews praise her help, but recent comments and class feels self-taught.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize course design, while and classroom teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and group work rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence leans toward modules, quizzes, and assignments, while , and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews often describe , long packets, strict grading, and , though some older students found her helpful.

Main concern

Class time often feels like self-teaching through packets and group work.

What students said

“She cannot teach, her style is so hard to understand.”
MATH160
“It's basically an online class with and depressing.”
MATH160
“IDK why ppl marked her low on here. Math is hard but she makes it easy.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews emphasize very , and high stress, with only a few students finding the structure clear enough to succeed.

Main concern

The workload can be overwhelming and .

What students said

“She expects you to spend at least 16 hr/week on this class.”
MATH160
“This class is if it wasn't the last GE Req. that I have left.”
MATH160
“It is not hard AT ALL to get a good grade in the class if you follow the assignments.”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but exam rules are inconsistent and not fully proven.

Test heavyRepeat attempts mentionedHard final mentionedExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard finals or mismatched tests for others, so the exam style varies.

Test heavyRepeat attempts mentionedHard final mentioned
“we only had 2 exams which were easy and the .”
MAATH160
“ ”
MATH160
“study guide is nothing like the test”
MATH160

Online

, and test-heavy work, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Test heavyQuizzes mentionedExam policy unclear
“The homework and the ”
MAT160
“You have three chances for each quiz.”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Believe the bad reviews.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She cannot teach, her style is so hard to understand.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“She assigns 20-30 assignments a week and we didn't get a spring break week off.”

⚖️

18/100

“If you do a and you'll get a zero.”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“Save yourself the stress.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • answers questions with questions, and the lectures are very .
  • .
  • Everything is independent work and group work.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The online modules are so long it is horrendous that if not more just to finish one.
  • She expects you to spend at least 16 hr/week on this class.
  • There is about 35 assignments per week and it's hard to keep up with

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades and Exams

  • Garde's very harshly, but we only had 2 exams which were easy and the .
  • and QUIZZES 2-3 TIMES!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 43 reviews across many years, with strong , and teaching concerns.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATH16023 reviews
MAATH1604 reviews
1203 reviews
MAT1603 reviews
MATH2803 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH601603 reviews
901 review
MATH1101 review
MATH14631 review
MATH16095771 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

12

B+ 4 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

6

C 3 · C- 3

D range

4

D+ 3 · D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2