AI Rate Professor

Exercise & Sport Science

David Dominguez

ES180 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

Only take him online if you can self-teach, but and more enjoyable experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery easyFormat-dependentHands-off onlineFun in personLow workload
  • The tiny review set is split between a harsh recent online coding complaint and .
  • Course easiness appears high, but teaching quality depends heavily on the class format and subject.
  • The online review says students must self-teach, while as fun, easy, and supportive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

The class seems grade-friendly because all reviews describe low difficulty or an A outcome, but the online student disliked the self-teaching burden.

Online evidence shows an A despite frustration, while .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students describe the workload and difficulty as very easy, though the online coding review says the lack of teaching makes learning harder.

In-person reviews make the class sound easy and fun, while the online review says beginner coding became self-taught rather than conceptually well supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be firmly judged.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on format because the only recent online , while .

Online evidence is strongly negative, while but old and based on different class experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

There is not enough grading detail, but the low difficulty and one reported A tag.

Format shift

Online has a tough-grader tag without detailed grading proof, while .

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload appears light because all reviews give very low difficulty, though the online coding review says students must read and code alone.

Format shift

In-person reviews clearly describe an easy class, while online workload may feel heavier because support is limited.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching evidence is split between a recent online complaint that he does not teach and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is poor, while but old.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Assessment evidence is weak, but the online review has a and the other reviews do not describe graded assignments.

Format shift

Only the online review includes assessment tags, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The two in-person reviews are positive, describing the class as , and physically manageable.

Main concern

The and may not reflect current teaching.

What students said

“really cool, really easy, really fun class”
ES180
“He makes the work out in our class fun and doesn't push anyone to work harder than they are physically able to.”
ES180

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and says he does not teach enough for a beginner coding class.

Main concern

Students may have to learn the material mostly on their own.

What students said

“he doesn't teach anything he makes you read and you go code by yourself.”
ES180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

online test-heavy tag, so the overall exam risk should be treated as uncertain and standard.

Test Heavy TagPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, final format, open-book rules, or proctoring rules.

Online

The online review has a test-heavy tag, but student comments do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Test Heavy TagPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he doesn't teach anything he makes you read and you go code by yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting the split between recent online criticism and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“David is an amazing teacher!”

👍 Recommendation Risk

50/100

“Just Do not take him take someone that will actually help you to build the foundation of your career.”

📉 Workload Lightness

82/100

“really cool, really easy, really fun class”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Teaching

  • he doesn't teach anything he makes you read and you go code by yourself.
  • build the foundation of your career.

Theme 2

🏫

  • really cool, really easy, really fun class
  • He makes the work out in our class fun and doesn't push anyone to work harder than they are physically able to.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty

  • really easy
  • he makes you read and you go code by yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 3 reviews, the , and the online review covers a different course experience.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ES1803 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values