AI Rate Professor

History

Lacole Martin

Courses not reported · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you can , and minimal support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderUnclear ExpectationsHeavy ReadingPoor CommunicationAvoid Strongly
  • Students consistently describe the class as , and poorly supported.
  • Reviews repeatedly , and slow or missing grading.
  • Both online and the course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Even strong students report , and unusually harsh grading for a 100-level class.

Both formats report harsh grading, with online reviews , and quiz problems.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course is described as far harder than expected because of , and unclear expectations.

Online reviews provide most of the evidence for and , while in-person reviews confirm the course feels harder than it should.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

30/100

, but deadlines and late-work rules are described as strict and unforgiving.

Online reviews clearly mention no late work and missed-deadline penalties, while deadline flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students almost unanimously warn against taking her because of , and high stress.

Both online and being much more numerous.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Reviews repeatedly say she grades hard, gives vague or , and allows little recovery.

Format shift

Both formats report harsh grading, and online reviews add and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students describe lots of , and excessive workload for an intro-level course.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly document heavy reading and quizzes, while and many papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students consistently describe poor communication, confusing , and little help succeeding.

Format shift

Online reviews show severe problems with communication and organization, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention discussion posts, essays, papers, quizzes, and few graded items, with .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussion posts, essays, quizzes, and assignments, while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also highly negative and and excessive workload for an intro class.

Main concern

The main concern is difficult grading with little chance to recover from mistakes.

What students said

“Grades insanely difficult, I would be surprised if anybody has an A in her class.”
107
“Does if you made a mistake.”
107

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy reading, trick quizzes, vague feedback, missing grades, poor communication, and .

Main concern

The main concern is a high-stress online course with and little instructor response.

What students said

“ , so you have no idea how you are doing.”
107
“The , and there is a lot of reading.”
107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention difficult quizzes and assignments, but they do not clearly prove a full exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Difficult QuizzesTrick QuestionsAssignments and DiscussionsNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online

, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterm format, or final format.

Difficult QuizzesTrick Questions
“The , and there is a lot of reading.”
107
“ and wrong answers”
107

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If ; .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Level

2/100

“ .”

⚖️

5/100

“ and so easily without knowing why.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“150 pages of mercy for AN INTRO LEVEL CLASS.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Grades insanely difficult, I would be surprised if anybody has an A in her class.
  • She lowers grade down with .
  • RUBRIC).

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Quizzes

  • The , and there is a lot of reading.
  • week 2 had 150+ pages of reading and 2 essays.
  • Very tough grader for a 100-level class

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Doesn't respond to comments.
  • She responded to only the and none others.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 reviews are recent, detailed, and highly consistent across online and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 512

Course coverage

10712 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 3