AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Aaron Ward

CHEMISTRY · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are comfortable self-correcting through a hard, disorganized chemistry course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized lecturesTough gradingHeavy chemistry workloadCaring but newTest heavy
  • Students consistently describe Ward as kind and helpful, but the .
  • Chemistry content is hard, with , and strict attention to units and formulas.
  • Recommendation is split because effort can lead to passing, but multiple students warn against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

33/100

An A is possible, but and , and a need for outside help.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The chemistry material is described as very hard, math-heavy, and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation matters and lecture-heavy classes, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Some students value his kindness, but repeated warnings , and .

Recommendation and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students repeatedly call him a and and unit details.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report lots of homework, high study time, lab reports, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Ward is described as caring and engaging, but lectures and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews emphasize exams, tests, quizzes, lab reports, and as a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a caring professor whose chemistry class is hard, lecture-heavy, and .

Main concern

Students struggle with , and .

What students said

“ , and he sometimes seems a little overwhelmed by it all.”
CHEMISTRY
“The class is super hard and the .”
CHEMISTRY
“ !!!!!!!!!”
CHEMISTRY

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and test-heavy pressure, but reviews do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Strict grading on formulas and unitsTest heavyPop quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and pop quizzes, but not open-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Strict grading on formulas and unitsTest heavyPop quizzes mentioned
“ formulas or .”
CHEMISTRY
“The class is super hard and the .”
CHEMISTRY

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Cool and engaging, helpful, but sometimes a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ , and he sometimes seems a little overwhelmed by it all.”

⚖️

22/100

“It was also a formulas or .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“The class is super hard and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's pretty personable and just a .
  • , and he sometimes seems a little overwhelmed by it all.
  • The professor is nice, but lectures don't make sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class is super hard and the .
  • With enough effort this class is passable.
  • You will need to calculate .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • !!!!!!!!!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews are detailed and consistent about difficulty, but the sample is small and all from one course area.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEMISTRY6 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1