AI Rate Professor

Communication

Christie Pearson

PUBLICSPEAKING · COMM122 · COMM120 · ESL103 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle long lectures, delayed grades, and a as inconsistent.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSlow gradingLecture heavyTough graderGroup projectsMixed support
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with older praise for engaging teaching and and poor communication.
  • Students often describe grading as slow, tough, or based .
  • The class can reward prepared students, especially in public speaking, but beginners may feel unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some tests are easy, but , and comments like working hard for a B make an A feel costly.

Online evidence is too thin and negative, while and hard grading on speeches.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is understandable for some students, but long lectures, speeches, textbook reliance, and real-world experience gaps add difficulty.

Online reviews give little content detail, while and public speaking work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

grade, and another says skipping class means you will not pass.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students are divided because some learn a lot and enjoy her class, while others , and unfairness.

Online reviews lean negative with limited evidence, while and highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Many students describe tough , and few graded items that make each score matter.

Format shift

Online and , but in-person reviews provide much richer detail.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention lots of reading, speeches, and outlines.

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern is mainly supported by in-person reviews, with limited online detail.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is sometimes praised as engaging and knowledgeable, but , and organization lower the experience.

Format shift

Online reviews raise communication concerns, while unsupported.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments and final tests, and few graded items in some sections.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details, while one .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for engaging classes and expertise but , and long lectures.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report slow grading, lecture-heavy classes, and tough or .

What students said

“ .”
COMM122
“There are few things to be graded on and .”
COMM120
“Challenging class but .”
COMM122

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are limited and split between one severe complaint about communication and one vague positive comment.

Main concern

The main and unanswered emails.

What students said

“ . No communication between the student and her.”
COMM120
“Never answers the emails or answers very late.”
COMM120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Midterm and finalTests from textbookPop quizzes mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final tests, often tied to textbook reading, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Midterm and finalTests from textbookExam policy not clearly proven
“We only took 2 tests, one for the midterm and another for the final.”
COMM120
“Be certain to do the . Very important for midterm and final.”
COMM122
“ and she is very fair, but she is critical of speeches.”
COMM122

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes but do not clearly .

Pop quizzes mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“Beware of pop quizzes”
COMM120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Christie is a good teacher, but i never worked so hard for just a B.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Christie is one of the .”

⚖️

32/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

45/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Christie is an amazing teacher and have learned from class.
  • She is very lecture heavy, that lasts the entire class period.
  • She kept us aware for 8hrs-Sat class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Christie is a good teacher, but i never worked so hard for just a B.
  • She is also an extremely slow and and do not expect an A on any of your speeches unless she likes you or its absolutely perfect.
  • The amount of effort you put into preparing for your speeches will obvi determine your grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • . No communication between the student and her.
  • Never answers the emails or answers very late.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across online and , though opinions vary by year and course.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMM12212 reviews
COMM1206 reviews
ESL1031 review
PUBLICSPEAKING1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2