AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Annalinda Arroyo

MATH280 · 9618CEUS · MATH160 · MATH110 · MATH180 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.11%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle heavy independent work and inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teachingHeavy workloadHelpful when engagedLate grading complaintsGroup and Canvas heavy
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find her caring and clear and students who say she does not teach enough.
  • Workload is consistently , and group activities.
  • Online reviews are notably more negative about course structure, pacing, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible with effort, , and persistence, but the workload and .

Online reviews suggest grades are hard to track and pacing is rough, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, but many describe the course as , and work-heavy.

Online evidence is more challenging due to pacing and Canvas structure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Participation, group work, quizzes, and if strict rules are not clearly proven.

Online reviews do not prove an attendance rule, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on learning style because some students praise her support while many warn against the course.

, while in-person reviews are highly polarized with both strong praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students mention easy grading and , but , and unexpected final grades.

Format shift

Online reviews stress delayed and , while in-person reviews range from easy breakdowns to harsh outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and long assignments.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online students especially critical of assignment volume and pacing.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

She can be caring and clear for some students, but many describe poor organization, limited lecturing, and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mostly negative except for accessibility support, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

61/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, , and group activities.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize Canvas assignments and grading, while , and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

kindness and concept breakdowns but many complaints about heavy work, group learning, weak lectures, and .

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves through group work and .

What students said

“She was incredible at breaking down concepts and making the lectures interesting and fun to be in”
Math180
“She never lectures or teaches.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing heavy assignments, poor Canvas , and one positive note about accessibility support.

Main concern

Online students report falling behind easily because of workload and organization.

What students said

“ ”
MATH160
“With being .”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with quizzes and exams clearly mentioned but Browser rules.

QuizzesExamsOne FinalPractice Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and practice tests, with study needed for success.

QuizzesExamsOne FinalPractice Tests
“ and there. .”
Math180
“She gave us practice text which is so helpful and almost the same on the exam.”
9618CEUS

Online

Online reviews mention fast chapters and grading problems but do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“sure there is a lot of work, but this teacher made it easy for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She was incredible at breaking down concepts and making the lectures interesting and fun to be in”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Everything was fine but the very last month she was rushing through the last three units”

👍 Recommendation Risk

42/100

“Shes a very nice and sweet person. But .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she treated each and every student with respect and kindness
  • She never lectures or teaches.
  • she was great but this spring she was awful.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • sure there is a lot of work, but this teacher made it easy for me.
  • Lots of homework but this class is easy to earn an A in if you just try
  • and hard.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • easy with her grading and the
  • She didn't grade anything until after the class was over
  • I ended up with a B instead of an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years provide detailed evidence, though opinions are highly polarized by course and learning style.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH16012 reviews
Math1805 reviews
9618CEUS1 review
MATH1101 review
Math2801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1