AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Engineering

Sam Litvin

ENGR210 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you , and handle harsh grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsSelf-teaching requiredTough lab gradingRough finalSome grade bumps
  • Students consistently describe ENGR-210 as , and .
  • , though one student says final grades may be bumped a lot.
  • The main positive is that the class can become useful after students adjust to expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and the as grueling despite one report of grade bumps.

All evidence comes from in-person ENGR-210 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels challenging mainly because students must figure out expectations and problem solving with .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation matters appears in the tags and the , but reviews do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most comments advise caution because students describe poor teaching, disorganization, and self-teaching.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Lab reports are graded harshly, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload feels heavy because students must read, self-teach, and prepare for a .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students mostly describe unclear expectations, rambling instruction, and a need to teach themselves.

Format shift

positive review noting the class became helpful later.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention lab reports, reading, participation, and a , so assessment .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

with heavy self-teaching and inconsistent organization.

Main concern

Students often feel lost because expectations and .

What students said

“You teach yourself this class.”
ENGR-210
“ and .”
ENGR-210
“He ”
ENGR-210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The only clear exam evidence is a and .

Grueling Final ExamUnclear Grading Scale

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Grueling Final ExamUnclear Grading Scale
“The course improved toward the end until the .”
ENGR-210
“ .”
ENGR-210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For now if you enroll, prepare to teach yourself and be lost.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“You teach yourself this class.”

⚖️

32/100

“He ”

📚 Course Difficulty

25/100

“For now if you enroll, prepare to teach yourself and be lost.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You teach yourself this class.
  • he doesn't know how to teach anything he just rambles on about random bs
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He
  • The course improved toward the end until the .
  • He makes up for the rough as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three reviews, but they are recent and mostly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR-2103 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2