AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Exercise & Sport Science

Laura Ratto

ES175 · ES14B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a fun, practical, low-stress course with and a realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy grading pathKnowledgeable coachFun classParticipation mattersExtra credit
  • Students unanimously rate Ratto highly and .
  • Courses are low-stress, participation-based, and easy to do well in when expectations are followed.
  • Students praise her knowledge, approachability, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Grades appear very easy because students report A grades, , few grading items, and .

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The courses are practical, beginner-friendly, and described as easy to understand when students participate.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Participation matters is repeated across reviews, so though strict penalties are not clearly described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every reviewer gives top ratings and recommends her because the , and supportive.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Students report A grades, , few graded items, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

94/100

The workload appears very light, with short class time and activity-based .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe Ratto as , and helpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize participation, form, class activity, and few graded items rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe an easy, fun, participation-based class led by a knowledgeable and supportive coach.

Main concern

Participation appears important, so students should show up and engage.

What students said

“Amazing and fun class”
ES175
“ and knowledgeable.”
ES-14B
“Grading is explained on day 1 so you know how to easily get the grade you want from the course.”
ES175

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Grading is explained on day 1 so you know how to easily get the grade you want from the course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Coach Ratto is very knowledgeable and breaks things down to be easily understood.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“Amazing and fun class, a shame it's only for one day out of the week.”

⚖️

95/100

“Grading is explained on day 1 so you know how to easily get the grade you want from the course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knowledgeable.
  • Coach Ratto is very knowledgeable and breaks things down to be easily understood.
  • Professor even has her own athlete/coach counseling service.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 1.5 credits to lift weights.
  • Grading is explained on day 1 so you know how to easily get the grade you want from the course.
  • It's as serious as .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because all four reviews are recent and consistent, but the sample size is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ES-14B2 reviews
ES1752 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1