AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · English As A Second Language

David Garrett

ESL105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Only take him if , and independent learning.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNice personWeak explanationsTough graderStrict late workExam time pressure
  • Reviews , but teaching quality is mixed and one .
  • because comments , and a strict late policy.
  • because one student says there is not enough time for tests and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks difficult because a recent review , and limited test time.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course is not described as conceptually impossible, but and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person ESL105 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and the policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The recent review is , and exam time, despite an older positive comment.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with the recent review more negative than the older one.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

A recent student explicitly calls him a .

Format shift

, and no online reviews exist.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is not described as huge, but the course is graded by few things and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students agree he is nice, but and the recent review says he does not teach well.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with one negative recent review and one older positive review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The course appears driven by a few assignments plus tests and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, but they conflict on explanation quality and warn about tough grading and strict policies.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“he is not good at explaining or teaching the material.”
ESL105
“he is a and has a strict late work policey.”
ESL105
“ ”
ESL105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review says students do not get enough time for tests and exams, but format rules are not clearly proven.

Not Enough Exam TimeStrict Academic IntegrityPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams and strict consequences for cheating, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Not Enough Exam TimeStrict Academic IntegrityPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“he does not give enough time for and exams.”
ESL105
“he doesn't like cheating and he catch you .”
ESL105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is a and has a strict late work policey.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

22/100

“he is a and has a strict late work policey.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“he is not good at explaining or teaching the material.”

⏱️

30/100

“he does not give enough time for and exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Garrett seems like a nice guy, but he is not good at explaining or teaching the material.
  • He is a nice person.

Theme 2

⚖️ And Rules

  • The course is graded on only a few assignments, but he is a and has a strict late work policey.
  • he doesn't like cheating and he catch you .
  • he does not give enough time for and exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

in time, and they conflict on teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL1052 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1