Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
58/100An A is possible through studying, practice, and the curve, but .
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is possible through studying, practice, and the curve, but hard exams make it far from automatic.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.
Is the course easy?
The math content is challenging mainly because exams are hard and several students say the teaching does not fully prepare them.
Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly state whether attendance is optional or mandatory.
Only in-person reviews are available, and they do not prove an attendance policy.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend him only if you can tolerate difficult exams and self-study, while several strongly warn against taking him.
Recommendation evidence comes only from in-person reviews and is highly mixed.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
55/100
Grading is disputed because some students describe generous curves while others call him harsh and punishing on tests.
Format shift
All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Workload
Moderate
55/100
Homework is sometimes light or completion-based, but exam preparation creates a substantial workload.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews mention workload.
Teaching experience
Average
50/100
Some students praise his notes and organization, but many describe confusing teaching, poor communication, and self-teaching.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews are available, and they show sharply mixed teaching experiences.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
85/100
Grades are heavily exam-based, with multiple reviews saying tests make up about 70% of the grade.
Format shift
All assessment evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews describe a difficult, test-heavy math class with mixed teaching quality and some grading generosity.
Main concern
Hard exams and unclear teaching can make the course stressful.
What students said
“70% of the grade are from the exams, and they're really hard.”
“EXTREMELY lenient grading policy - 3 midterms that total 120 points but grades the category out of 80.”
“Either self teach or find a better teacher.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
The overall exam risk is high because tests are difficult, heavily weighted, and often described as harshly graded.
Assessment risk
Strict
35/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews clearly describe hard, heavily weighted exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.
“70% of the grade are from the exams, and they're really hard.”
“tests made up 70% of your grade (midterms were 50%, final was 20%)”
“there's also no exam corrections or extra credit.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Pretty good professor with an intimidating, but generous grading scheme.”
“Strong lecturer whose notes are easy to follow.”
“70% of the grade are from the exams, and they're really hard.”
“Exams are pretty tough but there is a curve, and rewards you for reading, memorizing core concepts and paying attention.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
10
Recent reviews read by the AI
9
Lifetime ratings
86/100
Evidence confidence
Ten recent in-person reviews provide detailed and consistent evidence about exams, grading, and teaching even though opinions differ.
Inside 10 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
8 reported outcomes
A+ 1 · A 3
B- 1
No reported values
No reported values
F 1
Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1