AI Rate Professor

English

Dulce Arteaga

ENGL120 · ENGL124 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding writing course with strict grading and are ready to ask for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderNitpicky feedbackUnclear directionsHigh stressSome useful feedback
  • Most students describe the course as much harder than it should be for entry-level English.
  • inconsistent.
  • A and said students can improve if they seek help early.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Getting an A is difficult because as nitpicky, harsh, inconsistent, and damaging to grades.

Both formats report hard grading, with online reviews sounding especially severe.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The content may be entry-level English, but vague directions, strict expectations, and .

Both formats call the class harder than expected, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews mention strict deadlines, little empathy for late work, and participation-related expectations rather than flexibility.

The strongest flexibility complaints appear online and in person, but no review gives a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking her because the class feels stressful, harshly graded, and not very rewarding.

Both formats lean negative, though one online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough, nitpicky, unreasonable, and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention lots of , and little room to fall behind.

Format shift

Online reviews show heavier workload complaints, while and balance problems.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

She gives useful feedback for some students, but most comments , and a stressful classroom experience.

Format shift

Both formats show weak teaching satisfaction, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Student comments , and deadlines rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats appear writing-assignment driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also mostly negative or cautious, though a few students say .

Main concern

Students report vague directions, strict deadlines, and entry-level courses made harder than necessary.

What students said

“Run away!”
ENGL-120
“ , but it honestly helped my writing grow a lot throughout the course.”
ENGL-124
“ and she's really picky about the small stuff so it makes the class harder that it should be.”
ENGL-120

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing unreasonable grading, nitpicking, heavy work, and a difficult experience.

Main concern

Online students repeatedly say grading feels harsh or inconsistent and the class damages motivation.

What students said

“No. !!!”
ENGL-120
“The , and she made my writing feel weak compared to previous professors”
ENGL-124
“Very difficult professor. .”
ENGL-124

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam rules, .

Exam policy not clearly provenPapers dominate assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Exam policy not clearly provenPapers dominate assessment
“Essays and to the class.”
ENGL-124

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book format.

Exam policy not clearly provenPapers dominate assessment
“probably hard to get a good grade on this class”
ENGL-120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No. !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Didn't really learn much at all.”

⚖️

12/100

“The , and she made my writing feel weak compared to previous professors”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“Avoid if you can trust”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Dulce is very hard to approach and .
  • Very difficult professor. .
  • She does not beat around the bush at all .

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty and Workload

  • This class was unreasonably difficult for being an entry level class for students.
  • she makes class unbelievably hard
  • Deadlines are strict and it can be easy to fall behind.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but the class is a weird mix of trying to be relatable and hip but also still feeling really dry
  • , but it honestly helped my writing grow a lot throughout the course.
  • and she's really picky about the small stuff so it makes the class harder that it should be.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent reviews show a consistent negative pattern, with enough detail across both formats to support the main conclusions.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGL-12011 reviews
ENGL-1244 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1