AI Rate Professor

Environmental Science

Julie Godfrey

EHSM135 · EHSM130 · EHSM200 · EHSM100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
94.12%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and makes EHSM courses practical and approachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear and supportiveInspirational lecturesAccessible helpProject basedLenient and caring
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Julie Godfrey as engaging, caring, and clear.
  • Grades are very strong, with many A and A+ outcomes and and flexibility.
  • Online evidence is mostly positive, but one older and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Most reported grades are A or A+, and , and some flexibility make strong grades very attainable.

Both formats show strong grades, while the only serious grading complaint comes from one older online review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content is usually easy to understand because and connects material to practical examples.

Online reviews stress clear instructions, while and real-world examples.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but .

In-person reviews mention participation more often, while online reviews do not show a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and helpful.

Both formats are strongly recommended, with one older online outlier lowering certainty slightly.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and late-work flexibility suggest generally lenient grading.

Format shift

Online includes the only tough-grader complaint, while .

Workload

Light

76/100

Most students describe the work as manageable, though .

Format shift

Online workload is usually manageable but has one heavy-workload outlier; as relevant and engaging.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly praise her clarity, enthusiasm, support, and ability to make the material understandable.

Format shift

In-person comments are especially enthusiastic, while online comments are still strongly positive except for one outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and group work than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly says no tests and project based, while and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, highlighting engaging lectures, support, and real-world relevance.

Main concern

Participation and .

What students said

“Never a boring day in class.”
EHSM-200
“She provides us with .”
EHSM-135
“assigns work that is challenging but relevant to the field and study”
EHSM130

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly excellent, emphasizing clear directions, accessibility, and project-based work.

Main concern

One older online review reports lots of , and .

What students said

“This class was easy to understand, and the professor gave us all the information and instructions we needed to do well.”
EHSM-200
“No tests. Project based.”
EHSM130
“Unfortunately the only professor that teaches some of the classes.”
EHSM130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence says the online class had no tests and .

No TestsProject Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no tests and project-based work in one review, while .

No TestsProject Based
“No tests. Project based.”
EHSM130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Julie is hands down one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She provides us with .”

👍 Recommendation Strength

94/100

“ .”

⚖️

84/100

“she allowed me to turn the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never a boring day in class.
  • and is always there is you need her.
  • Amazing professor and good way to learn easily

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was easy to understand, and the professor gave us all the information and instructions we needed to do well.
  • No tests. Project based.
  • assigns work that is challenging but relevant to the field and study

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She was always there for me and helped me out.
  • She is so knowledgeable, responsible, and supportive.
  • she always offers her help and answers your questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen recent reviews across both formats are detailed and highly consistent, with only one major negative outlier.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EHSM1309 reviews
EHSM-1354 reviews
EHSM-2003 reviews
EHSM-1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 9 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values