AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Dale Hull

PHIL125 · PHILO110 · PHIL124 · PHILOSOPHY110 · HUMAN0080 · PHILO125 · PHIL110 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want an and are willing to keep up with regular work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerCaring and AccessibleFair GraderHomework-Based SuccessAttendance Matters
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Hull as passionate, caring, and able to make philosophy engaging.
  • Grades are usually very attainable if , and follow his study guidance.
  • The and participation, especially in in-person classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable because , and students say doing the assigned work is enough.

Online evidence is easier and more flexible, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Philosophy can feel abstract at first, but students say and makes the material manageable.

Online reviews call the work easy, while and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say missing class makes success harder.

Online reviews mention flexibility with assignments, while and not missing class.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes philosophy enjoyable.

Both formats are positive, with and in-person reviews emphasizing teaching quality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly describe fair or non-harsh grading, with and .

Format shift

Online reviews call him not harsh at all, while and effort-based.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is steady with , and participation, but most students say it is manageable if done on time.

Format shift

Online homework is described as easy, while and attendance pressure.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently praise , and ability to make philosophy interesting.

Format shift

Online reviews praise responsiveness and care, while and support.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and some paper-only courses, so assessment varies by course.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize activity reports and essays, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and support but repeatedly say students , and participate.

Main concern

Some students find the workload or first-day intensity intimidating if they fall behind.

What students said

“You have to do the work, but it is not difficult work.”
PHIL110
“Just don't miss a day.”
PHIL110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe very easy, engaging homework, fast responses, flexibility, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“The and actually interesting.”
110
“Fs Easy A!!”
110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, with some midterm and and some paper-only formats, but reviews do .

EssaysActivity ReportsMidterm and FinalPaper-Based CoursesStudy Guidance

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and paper-only courses, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Midterm and FinalTerm PaperNo Exams in Some CoursesHomework as Study Guide
“The midterm and .”
PHIL110
“ ”
PHIL124

Online

Online reviews mention activity reports and essay questions, but do not clearly .

Activity ReportsEssay Questions
“The class grades relies heavily on Activity reports (which are two) and essay questions”
110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dale really cares that you learn. . Very fair. You have to do the work, but it is not difficult work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“He definitely knows his stuff!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

⚖️

82/100

“Very fair with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Hull put a lot of energy into keeping it interesting.
  • This professor is extremely excited about his subject.
  • He made me excited about this subject also

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you come to class, do the work, then you will receive a good grade.
  • It isn't that hard, just do what he asks and you will get a good grade.
  • Fs Easy A!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He is there for his students and begs for questions.
  • He puts forth a lot of effort to make sure the student has what they need.
  • He wants everyone to pass his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 37 reviews span many years and show a highly consistent pattern with detailed comments.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL11022 reviews
PHIL1256 reviews
1104 reviews
HUMAN00801 review
PHIL1241 review
Show 3 more courses
PHILO1101 review
PHILO1251 review
PHILOSOPHY1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values