AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Physics

Jerome Lambert

PHYC201 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Lambert looks like a strong choice if you want a fair physics instructor and can keep up with a brisk math pace.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringHelpful FeedbackFair ExamsFast Math PaceAccessible
  • Students describe Lambert as caring, fair, and and in-person reviews.
  • Grades look very attainable, but physics math may move quickly for some students.
  • The evidence is positive but limited because there are only three reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

All reported grades are in the A range, but A.

Online has one A+ lab review, while and one pace concern.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Physics content is not described as easy, and one review says the .

Online evidence focuses on support, while fast math pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews mention office hours and recorded lectures but .

, though in-person lectures were recorded.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and keeps exams fair.

Both formats are positive, but because it mentions exams and recorded lectures.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Exams are called fair and grades are high, though .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the , while the .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reviews do not describe heavy workload, but physics coursework and .

Format shift

Online evidence is too limited for workload detail, while and exams.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, helpful, fair, and .

Format shift

Both formats praise support, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and recorded lectures, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Online evidence comes from lab instruction, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lectures, and a slightly fast math pace.

Main concern

One student says he goes a bit fast when explaining math.

What students said

“ and and exams.”
PHYC-201
“He goes a bit fast when explaining the math.”
PHYC-201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and care for student comprehension in a physics lab.

Main concern

Only one online review is available, and .

What students said

“ and seemed to care about students comprehension on topics.”
PHYC-201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , and reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or strict exam controls.

Fair ExamsHomework FeedbackRecorded Lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book, open-book, or strict proctoring rules.

Fair Exams
“ and and exams.”
PHYC-201

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Lambert is a great guy. He genuinely cares about his students and wants them to do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and pacing. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He genuinely cares about his students and wants them to do well.”

⚖️

70/100

“ and and exams.”

📐 Course Pace

55/100

“He goes a bit fast when explaining the math.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Lambert is a great guy.
  • .
  • and seemed to care about students comprehension on topics.

Theme 2

📈 About Exams and Grades

  • and and exams.
  • He goes a bit fast when explaining the math.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, so the tone is consistent but the evidence base is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYC-2013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values