AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Jolene Crowley

GD110 · GD225 · GD222 · GD105 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable with , and learning a lot on your own.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingUnclear feedbackHeavy projectsMixed teaching qualityHelpful in older reviews
  • , and low recommendation value.
  • patience and basic design help.
  • Online reviews are consistently negative and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because many students , and high project standards despite a few high grades.

Online evidence is consistently harsh, while in-person evidence is mixed but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content may be basic design work, but students and technical help is inconsistent.

, while in-person reviews range from beginner-friendly help to weak technical instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One positive in-person review says she is flexible about arriving late, but another review warns that skipping class can hurt passing.

, and online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most recent students do not recommend her because , and .

Online reviews are fully negative, while and newer strong criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple students call her a tough or harsh grader and .

Format shift

Both online and especially severe.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Several reviews mention lots of homework or .

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly tag lots of homework, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

, but recent reviews often describe unclear explanations, weak technical support, and poor learning value.

Format shift

Online reviews are negative, while and strong recent criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and design work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split, with older praise for helpfulness but and .

Main concern

Students report inconsistent teaching quality and .

What students said

“I dropped the class when she did the same .”
GD105
“She is a little tough sometimes and on some things but .”
GD225

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and boring lectures.

Main concern

Students say feedback and and unforgiving.

What students said

“The was unclear and basically useless.”
GD105
“Jolene Crowley is without a doubt is the .”
GD110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm policy, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The was unclear and basically useless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Is the school art teachers because they at least show you how to do things.”

⚖️

18/100

“Jolene Crowley is without a doubt is the .”

👍 Recommendation Value

25/100

“ if I was paid a large sum of money and I'm broke college kid.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not know how to do this course and has a student help her.
  • and extremely patient!
  • Very helpful and gave me a great foundation using layers!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Workload

  • She gave me a D or an F from one of my works that I worked so hard to design and .
  • Half the class got F's on the first project, but she said not to worry, we could do it over again.
  • She is a little tough sometimes and on some things but .

Theme 3

💬

  • The was unclear and basically useless.
  • She goes over the and will help you if you are struggling with understanding.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has 16 reviews across many years and both formats, but opinions shift strongly over time.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

GD1059 reviews
GD1105 reviews
GD2221 review
GD2251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values