AI Rate Professor

English

Karen Marrujo

ENG236 · ENGL120 · ENG120 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Marrujo can be rewarding with strong feedback, but if you cannot handle essay-heavy work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingCaring feedbackEssay heavyTough grading riskFlexible deadlines
  • Reviews are extremely polarized, with many 5-star recommendations and .
  • Positive , and confidence-building teaching style.
  • The biggest risk is unpredictable or easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

Many students earn A grades and call the class easy, but .

Online reviews show both easy A outcomes and , while but still mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The course content is usually manageable, but , and writing expectations create real workload.

Online reviews mention lots of reading and essays, while hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Reviews mention Zoom meetings and participation credit, but also deadline flexibility and .

Online reviews discuss Zoom meetings and credit opportunities, while and office hours.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students either strongly recommend her for support or because of .

Online evidence is the most polarized, while negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students praise flexible deadlines and , but others report harsh essay penalties and .

Format shift

Online grading reports conflict sharply, while and strict expectations.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The class includes substantial reading, videos, papers, and essays, but some students found it manageable or easy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more reading and papers, while .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Many students say she is caring and helpful, but severe negative reviews question her teaching and .

Format shift

, while online reviews are strongly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and engaging classes, but one student strongly criticizes teaching and expectations.

Main concern

Some in-person students may find .

What students said

“Prof. Marrujo boosted up my writing confidence so much and understands you in every single way.”
ENG120
“Really great professor, dedicates time to help her students do papers and answers any questions you have”
ENG120
“Everything you do is wrong for her and doesn't meet her expectations.”
ENGL120

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between enthusiastic praise for flexibility and severe complaints about harsh or .

Main concern

and harsh for some students.

What students said

“Overall it was an easy class. .”
ENG236
“One line that I had she said was plagiarized and gave my 4+ page essay a 0.”
ENG120
“She does movie days and is always referencing movies and tv.”
ENG120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policies, but assessment appears mostly essay and .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatEssay-based assessmentCreative work option

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Paper-based assessmentOffice hour support
“dedicates time to help her students do papers and answers any questions you have”
ENG120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Essay-based assessmentCreative work optionZoom meetings
“We had 3 essays to turn in, but she gave us the option to do a creative work”
ENG236
“She has you meet with her 3 times in the semester through zoom”
ENG120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take this class! ! She's an amazing instructor who understands how it is being a student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“If you need guidance with anything, she and make you a stronger writer.”

⚖️

45/100

“I got 79% and she gave me a D because she has a different graded system”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ ! she is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Marrujo boosted up my writing confidence so much and understands you in every single way.
  • She and accepts late work if you tell her prior to the due date.
  • All she talks about is her life stories.

Theme 2

📝

  • There are a lot of reading assignments and videos to watch, but they were fun to read and watch.
  • and readings.
  • We had 3 essays to turn in, but she gave us the option to do a creative work

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • I got 79% and she gave me a D because she has a different graded system
  • One line that I had she said was plagiarized and gave my 4+ page essay a 0.
  • Overall it was an easy class. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years and both formats provide rich detail, though opinions are highly divided.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1207 reviews
ENG2363 reviews
ENGL1202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1