AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Wei Huang

CHEM120 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself chemistry and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor TeachingTest HeavyRushed ExamsHeavy HomeworkLow Support
  • and say they had to learn material on their own.
  • Quizzes, tests, labs, and as changing mid-semester with .
  • One positive in-person review says passing can be manageable if lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A is possible, but comments point , and self-teaching rather than easy points.

The online review stresses rushed exams, while and changing quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content becomes harder because students repeatedly .

Both formats suggest students must rely on themselves, with only one in-person review calling the course manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Comments say missing lecture causes problems and one tag says students will not pass if .

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while the single online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because of poor teaching, rushed tests, and a lack of support.

Both online and in-person evidence lean negative, though the online review is less hostile about his personality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students mention , and changing quiz rules.

Format shift

, while the online review also reports rushed quizzes and exams.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and labs.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence is mainly in-person, with online evidence focused more on reading and tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments say he cannot teach clearly and leaves students to learn chemistry on their own.

Format shift

The online review calls him fun but unhelpful, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly emphasize quizzes and and labs also present.

Format shift

, and and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and rushed tests.

Main concern

and changing assessments create high risk.

What students said

“Halfway through the course tests, quizzes, labs, and .”
CHEM120
“ . hes arrogant and rude and cant teach properly”
CHEM120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says he was charismatic but lectures were less useful than the textbook and timed quizzes and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Get ready to do your own research to understand the material!”
CHEM120
“The time that he provides students during quizzes and .”
CHEM120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly support rushed quiz and but do not prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Rushed ExamsShort QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and insufficient test time, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Short QuizzesRushed Tests
“theyre supposed to be 30 min long and now theyre down to 10”
CHEM120
“You do not get enough time for tests”
CHEM120

Online

The online review says quizzes and exams have too little time, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Rushed ExamsTest Heavy
“You will be rushing all the time trying to finish them in time.”
CHEM120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get ready to do your own research to understand the material!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“One of the . there is. He can't teach and gives a lot of homework.”

⏱️

25/100

“The time that he provides students during quizzes and .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“ . hes arrogant and rude and cant teach properly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The textbook was more useful than any of the lectures ever were.
  • He's like a middle school teacher teaching in college and has no knowledge of teaching chemistry properly

Theme 2

📝

  • Halfway through the course tests, quizzes, labs, and .
  • he changes up the .
  • You will be rushing all the time trying to finish them in time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across online and , but the sample is small and mostly from 2020.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM1206 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values