AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Najah Abdelkader

PHI110 · PHIL104 · PHIL110 · PHILO110 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take her only if and value an .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery easy gradesUnclear teachingSelf-teaching riskPolarizing personalityMinimal tests
  • Grades appear very easy, with several students saying she gives grades away or requires little work for an A.
  • Teaching quality is highly polarized, with praise from some students but , and support.
  • Students who mainly want a grade may benefit, but students who want strong instruction should be cautious.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Multiple students say , and an A is possible with little effort.

All Easy A because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The workload and , but and self-teaching make the learning experience harder than the grade suggests.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they split between very easy course demands and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, though one student says showing up should be enough for an A.

and is indirect.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

, while many warn against taking her for actual learning or .

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation evidence is strongly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly describe , and minimal assessment pressure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

, and very little assigned work until late in the term.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Despite a few strong defenders, many students describe unclear lectures, messy organization, weak support, and self-teaching.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are highly polarized but lean negative on teaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment evidence points mostly to quizzes, reading, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but inconsistent and often criticized teaching quality.

Main concern

Many students report , and needing to teach themselves.

What students said

“there are no tests except for online quizzes, which are automatically 100% because .”
PHI110
“having to go home and teach yourself the material.”
PHIL104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest evidence says there are no tests except online quizzes that can be retried until correct, making exams very student-friendly.

Online QuizzesNo Tests Except QuizzesRepeat-Until-Correct QuizzesOne Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

online quizzes that can be retried until correct, plus one paper.

Online QuizzesNo Tests Except QuizzesRepeat-Until-Correct QuizzesOne Paper
“there are no tests except for online quizzes, which are automatically 100% because .”
PHI110
“there is .”
PHI110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A in her class because honestly if you show up to class u should get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy Grade Path

92/100

“ but gives grades away”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Expect messy PowerPoints and irrelevant lectures and having to go home and teach yourself the material.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

45/100

“I would highly reccomend not taking philosophy or any courses with her.”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades And Workload

  • there are no tests except for online quizzes, which are automatically 100% because .
  • I did it sloppy and under 2 hours and I still got an A.
  • but gives grades away
  • Very easy but .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures are very interesting.
  • Expect messy PowerPoints and irrelevant lectures and having to go home and teach yourself the material.
  • She doesn't know the material well enough to teach it.
  • Her speech is pretty hard to understand, which made it hard to concentrate.

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • .
  • I would highly reccomend not taking philosophy or any courses with her.
  • .
  • this class is ok pretty easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews provide a consistent Easy A pattern, but many are old and opinions on teaching are sharply split.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHIL1104 reviews
PHI1103 reviews
PHIL1042 reviews
PHILO1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values