AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Engineering

John McCoy

ENGR119 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you want an easy ENGR119 grade and can handle some self-teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear gradingEasy AOutdated materialTA supportLight homework
  • Both reviews report A+ grades and very low difficulty.
  • Teaching quality is mixed because one student found the material sloppy and outdated while .
  • The , and staying current with homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Both reviewers earned A+ grades, difficulty was rated 1, and as manageable.

All evidence comes from in-person ENGR119 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course seems low in technical difficulty, but on outside help.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but one review warns that teaching can be sloppy and outdated.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with one strong positive and one mixed review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

A+ outcomes, , and clear grading criteria .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

as not bad, with no signs of heavy workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

One student praised his help, but another described the teaching as sloppy and outdated.

Format shift

and a self-teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize homework, drawings, grading criteria, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but uneven teaching quality.

Main concern

Some material may feel outdated and self-taught.

What students said

“ and the teacher aid”
ENGR119
“ it.”
ENGR119

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Hey is very sloppy and out of date on the material, he teaches the class but at times feel like you are teaching yourself”

📈 Easy Grade

94/100

“ it.”

⚖️

90/100

“He is willing to work the drawings with you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • it seems that he teaches the class as he just learned it the night before
  • He was a pretty good professor and the as well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it.
  • and the teacher aid

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict on teaching quality despite agreeing the class is easy.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1192 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values