AI Rate Professor

Music

Taylor Smith

MUS115 · MUS120 · MUS9054 · MUSIC110 · MUS110 · MUSI110 · MUS100 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

music class, but be cautious with older online sections because organization was a major problem.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPassionate LecturerEasy GradingHelpful In PersonDisorganized Online
  • In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students praising his passion, knowledge, humor, and support.
  • Online reviews are much weaker because , and poor course management.
  • The course is usually easy to pass, but the learning value depends heavily on format and student interest in music.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears very manageable because , and even an impossible-to-fail structure, though one review says it is more simple enough than a pure Easy A.

Online evidence says the class was an easy A despite poor management, while and lenient support.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The content is mostly introductory and easy, with only occasional complaints about boredom, reading, or needing genuine interest in music.

Both formats describe easy content, but online students learned less because of course management problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

, but in-person students say class is where the tested information comes from.

In-person evidence supports attendance as useful but not always strictly enforced, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

but online students explicitly warn against his online sections.

In-person reviews are enthusiastic, while all three online reviews describe serious organization problems.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Grading is usually easy, with , and direct test guidance mentioned in several in-person reviews.

Format shift

but unreliable, while as lenient and predictable.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most reviews describe simple papers, projects, and exams, though a .

Format shift

Online workload was reduced in one section, while and projects.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

He is praised as passionate, funny, knowledgeable, and , but older online reviews describe weak presence and organization.

Format shift

Teaching quality is high in person and much lower online because of absence and disorganization.

Assessment method

Balanced

49/100

Assessments appear , and participation-based work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention listening logs, exams, and papers, while , and easy tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students mostly describe a passionate, funny, knowledgeable teacher with and useful lectures.

Main concern

Some students may find lectures boring or music opinions distracting.

What students said

“ .”
MUS115
“Seriously the easiest class I've ever taken, almost to the .”
MUSI110

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students found the class easy but complained that , and slow or incorrect with grades.

Main concern

Poor online organization and .

What students said

“Class was an easy A but didn't really learn anything and paid for 2 books that were opened maybe twice.”
MUS115
“Professor Smith screwed up our grades for our Music 110 online class and is so disorganized.”
MUS110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Easy ExamsTest Questions Reviewed Before ExamCanceled Online Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test guidance, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Easy ExamsTest Review Before Exam
“ if you study.”
MUS110
“He goes over the and gives you the answers.”
MUSI110

Online

Online reviews mention canceled exams and ungraded exams but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Canceled ExamsUngraded Exam
“ended up cancelling two listening logs and 2 exams”
MUS115
“he didn't grade our exam 2”
MUS115

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Loved this prof, he's very passionate about what he teaches.”

📈 Easy Grade

86/100

“Seriously the easiest class I've ever taken, almost to the .”

⚠️ Online Risk

72/100

“I do not recommend taking an online class with Professor Smith, he seemingly ditched our class for a good amount of time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Taylor is a great teacher.
  • Teacher definitely knows material.
  • He loves teaching and knows his stuff eventhough he's young he has a lot of knowledge about his field.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • Not so much an "Easy A" as "simple-enough".

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • Class was an easy A but didn't really learn anything and paid for 2 books that were opened maybe twice.
  • Professor Smith screwed up our grades for our Music 110 online class and is so disorganized.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show a .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUS1104 reviews
MUS1153 reviews
MUSIC1103 reviews
MUS1202 reviews
90541 review
Show 3 more courses
MUS1001 review
MUS90541 review
MUSI1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1