AI Rate Professor

Music

Joe Bigham

MUS115 · MUSC115 · MUSIC122 · MUS111 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

, but do not expect perfect communication in every format.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPassionate lecturerEasy classMusic-focusedFunny and engagingOccasional poor communication
  • Most students call Bigham passionate, knowledgeable, funny, and easy to learn from.
  • The class is usually easy, especially for students who attend lectures and enjoy music.
  • A , and limited feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The course is usually an easy A with light work, easy tests, and , though online discussion posts and .

In-person reviews consistently call it easy, while online reviews include one and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly describe the music content as interesting, accessible, and not very difficult.

Both formats describe approachable content, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not shown as strictly mandatory, but .

In-person evidence links success to attending lectures, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students recommend him for engaging lectures, music knowledge, humor, and an easy course structure.

, while online recommendations are positive overall but reduced by one communication-heavy complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Grades appear forgiving because , and reported grades are mostly A-range.

Format shift

, while online grading is less comfortable because delayed feedback created uncertainty.

Workload

Light

85/100

Workload is light, with a few tests, listening assignments, journals, and some online discussion posts.

Format shift

In-person workload is repeatedly light, while one online review says three discussion posts per week felt like too much.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students describe him as passionate, knowledgeable, funny, and able to make music history engaging.

Format shift

, while online teaching is praised for lecture content but criticized once for communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix tests with listening , and .

Format shift

and assignments, while online reviews mention discussion posts and lecture materials.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, describing an easy, interesting class led by a passionate and funny professor.

Main concern

The class can be lecture heavy and benefits from attending class.

What students said

“Overall an interesting and easy class to fill a humanity.”
MUS115
“This class was very easy as long as you came to lectures.”
MUS115

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between excellent lecture content and one and .

Main concern

Online .

What students said

“Prof. Bigham is an amazing lecturer.”
MUS115
“He , so you were left in wonder about what your current grade actually was.”
MUS115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and easy when mentioned, but reviews do .

TestsMemorizationReviews do not clearly prove proctoring rules

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and memorization, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

TestsMemorization
“Not a lot of class work a , and journals.”
MUS115
“ , but they are easy.”
MUS115

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser use, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is hands down one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Joe has a passion for music and you can tell by the way he teaches class.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

88/100

“This class was very easy as long as you came to lectures.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

65/100

“He's awful at returning emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Bigham is an amazing lecturer.
  • The instructor has a genuine passion for music, and wants to see his students succeed in the class.
  • Funny guy, makes a 3hr class on a Friday morning quite enjoyable even if you have no interest in the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall an interesting and easy class to fill a humanity.
  • , but they are easy.
  • Not a lot of class work a , and journals.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • I .
  • He , so you were left in wonder about what your current grade actually was.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews over many years are strongly consistent about easy workload and engaging teaching, with a few detailed communication concerns.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUS11511 reviews
MUS1111 review
MUSC1151 review
MUSIC1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1