AI Rate Professor

History

Julia Jones

HIST109 · HIST108 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Only take her if and , because the student experience is inconsistent and often negative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesUnorganizedReading-heavyExtra creditInconsistent grading
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with some students finding her clear and helpful while .
  • The workload and grade experience vary sharply, especially online, where one review says very easy and another says overwhelming.
  • Many in-person students complain about lateness, unclear notes, poor communication, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

and , but many students say grades require heavy reading, unclear assignments, or near-perfect work.

Online evidence is split between very easy quizzes and overwhelming quiz workload, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The history content is manageable for readers but becomes harder because lectures, notes, and as unclear.

Online reviews conflict on difficulty, while and unclear organization.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Attendance is important for lectures and readings, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews say students need to attend and keep up, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students advise against taking her because of , and unclear communication.

Online reviews are split, while positive comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students cite and easy grading, but , and few graded items.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is contradictory, while but also complaints about toughness and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many reviews mention lots of reading, long quizzes, papers, and though one online review reports only light weekly work.

Format shift

The online format has one light-workload report and one overwhelming report, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Frequent complaints about boring lectures, unclear PowerPoints, lateness, disorganization, and poor responses outweigh the positive outliers.

Format shift

In-person reviews drive the poor teaching score, while online reviews focus more on workload and .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears , and few high-impact graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews often describe , and weak communication despite some and positive outliers.

Main concern

Lectures and organization are frequent complaints.

What students said

“ and .”
HIST108
“Her lectures were the most boring experience.”
HIST109

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews conflict sharply, with one calling the class very easy and another dropping because the work and .

Main concern

Workload and .

What students said

“probably only had to o 2 hours of .”
HIST108
“There was so much work that I could not focus on the other classes.”
HIST108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly discuss quizzes and graded work, with conflicting reports on whether quizzes are easy or overwhelming.

QuizzesUnlimited Quiz Attempts ReportedLong QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

QuizzesFew Graded Things
“ ”
HIST109
“The main critism that and false.”
HIST108

Online

Online reviews mention easy unlimited-try quizzes in one case and long high-weight quizzes in another, but do not clearly prove webcam, .

Unlimited Quiz AttemptsLong QuizzesHigh-Weight Quizzes
“ and you have unlimited tries to get a 100% in ”
HIST108
“ .”
HIST108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . and she is very unorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Her lectures were the most boring experience.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“There was so much work that I could not focus on the other classes.”

⚖️

48/100

“So much !! .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were the most boring experience.
  • She is very, very uninteresting and unhelpful.
  • She gives good lectures and lays out what you have to do clearly.

Theme 2

📚 About Reading and Workload

  • This class is work. You won't get away with anything short of perfection in this class.
  • you actually
  • assigns tons of .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and

  • So much !!
  • She offers a lot of as well, like watching historical movies and answering questions.
  • and you have unlimited tries to get a 100% in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews over a long time span give substantial evidence, though opinions are polarized and some reviews are old.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HIST10812 reviews
HIST1099 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1