AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Bruce McGraw

PHIL125 · HUM155 · RELG125 · REL120 · RELG215 · HUM110 · MYTH6363 · RELG120 · RELI120 · RELIGIOUSSTU · PHILLOGIC · RELI170 · PHIL110 · MYTHOLOGY · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and inconsistent support for a course that may still be easy to pass.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading HeavyMixed Teaching QualityTime-Consuming WorkEasy Tests When PreparedUneven Helpfulness
  • Student experiences are sharply split between inspiring, easy classes and .
  • The course is often content-easy but , and precise formatting.
  • Online evidence shows more workload complaints, while time span.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but many students , and following his formatting expectations.

Online reviews emphasize working hard for the grade, while and classes easy.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The concepts are usually manageable, but religion and mythology readings can feel dense without strong instructor help.

Online comments describe easy content with , while and confusing instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation and involvement often matter, but the reviews do .

, while in-person evidence includes class involvement and some on-campus test requirements.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend him when the class feels interesting and easy, but many warn against him because of , and workload.

Online recommendation is mixed but workload-heavy, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and formatting deductions, so leniency is inconsistent.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading and word-count issues more often, while and strict deductions.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Many reviews cite lots of , and videos.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, while frustration.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students find him clear and inspiring, but many describe him as .

Format shift

Online teaching is often self-directed, while and harsh criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and finals.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, worksheets, tests, and a final, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from very easy and , and unhelpful.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent teaching quality and help outside class.

What students said

“ .”
MYTHOLOGY
“Easy class, great teacher. ”
PHIL110

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe clear but and uneven grading expectations.

Main concern

Weekly reading, worksheets, discussions, and .

What students said

“Got an A but had to work for it.”
REL120
“No quizzes, 2 tests and a if you do all the reading.”
HUM155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard tests and finals, sometimes timed or inconvenient, but .

Tests From ReadingTimed TestsFinal ExamWeekend TestsOn-Campus Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests, quizzes, and an essay final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Easy TestsWeekend TestsOn-Campus TestsEssay Final
“ .”
HUM155
“The . .”
PHIL125

Online

, and timed tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Two Tests And FinalTimed Tests
“No quizzes, 2 tests and a if you do all the reading.”
HUM155
“The questions and they were timed”
HUM155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Got an A but had to work for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“clear and precise instruction. overall, good teacher.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“This class took 50% of my study time out of 18 units!”

👍 Recommendation Risk

45/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He basically just repeats what you read in the book, and does so poorly.
  • His lecture is as clear as can be.
  • Outstanding Professor. All material tested was taught.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Got an A but had to work for it.
  • .
  • Your answers can be correct but will fail you if its not written in a certain amount of words.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS of work for this online class
  • Class .
  • Online class had reading in the textbook every week, along with and two worksheets

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews across many years provide rich but highly mixed evidence, with stronger confidence on workload and polarization than on current policies.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

HUM15511 reviews
MYTHOLOGY4 reviews
PHIL1253 reviews
REL1203 reviews
PHIL1102 reviews
Show 9 more courses
RELG1202 reviews
HUM1101 review
MYTH63631 review
PHILLOGIC1 review
RELG1251 review
RELG2151 review
RELI1201 review
RELI1701 review
RELIGIOUSSTU1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1