Is this an easy A?
HardWork
35/100Some students earned A-range grades, but many comments , and .
Online evidence is only one negative deadline review, while but and exam complaints.
BUS121 · BUS129 · BUS122 · BUS121MANACC · BUS124 · BUS120 · BUSIN120 · 20 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Some students earned A-range grades, but many comments describe mismatched tests, strict grading, and needing to self-teach.
Online evidence is only one negative deadline review, while in-person evidence shows mixed grades but frequent grading and exam complaints.
Is the course easy?
Accounting content is manageable for some, but unclear lectures and poor alignment make the course feel harder than necessary.
Online difficulty centers on organization, while in-person difficulty centers on unclear teaching and test preparation.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly establish a consistent attendance policy.
Neither online nor in-person reviews provide clear attendance-policy evidence.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students do not recommend him because they found lectures unhelpful and assessments frustrating.
The only online review is strongly negative, and most in-person reviews also advise avoiding him despite a few positive outliers.
Course guide
Grading
Strict
25/100
Several students describe harsh or inconsistent grading, weak curves, and tests that do not match what they studied.
Format shift
Online grading evidence is limited, while in-person reviews repeatedly mention strict or unfair grading.
Workload
Heavy
30/100
Homework, reading, quizzes, and test preparation are repeatedly mentioned as burdensome or poorly sequenced.
Format shift
The online review focuses on random deadlines, while in-person reviews cite homework, reading, and test-heavy structure.
Teaching experience
Poor
30/100
Most comments say he is boring, unclear, unhelpful, or leaves students to teach themselves.
Format shift
Online evidence shows poor course management, while in-person evidence mainly criticizes lecture quality and support.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
80/100
Reviews emphasize quizzes, pop quizzes, midterms, exams, and test-heavy grading more than projects or assignments.
Format shift
Online mentions quizzes and assignments, while in-person comments repeatedly describe exams and quizzes as central.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews mostly describe boring lectures, weak explanations, and exams or grading that feel disconnected from preparation.
Main concern
Students often say they had to learn from the book or classmates.
What students said
“This class is all (in my opinion) self-taught.”
“Awful teacher, do not recommend taking his class.”
“Do not expect this teacher to help you with anything.”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
The single online review reports random deadlines and poor assignment organization.
Main concern
Unpredictable deadlines make planning difficult.
What students said
“Deadlines are entirely random.”
“You deserve better than this.”
Exam style
Exam evidence varies from open-book or cheat-sheet-friendly tests to complaints about unfair or mismatched exams.
Assessment risk
Varies
45/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention test-heavy grading, pop quizzes, cheat sheets, and one open-book test comment, but no clear proctoring policy.
“Lots of homework”
“There were three exams and you get to bring a "cheat" sheet (8x10), both sides to help you.”
“easy class, open book tests”
The online review mentions quizzes but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book policy.
“Homework? Due after the chapter's quiz.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“This class is all (in my opinion) self-taught.”
“Lectures are boring with no instruction.”
“Curve is a lie!”
“Awful teacher, do not recommend taking his class.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
20
Recent reviews read by the AI
20
Lifetime ratings
82/100
Evidence confidence
Twenty reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of concerns despite some positive outliers.
Inside 20 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
4 reported outcomes
A- 2
No reported values
C+ 1 · C 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values