AI Rate Professor

English

Robert Montana

ENGLISH120 · POSC121 · ENG110 · ENG1275 · ENG124 · C082821 · ENGL124 · POLSCI121 · ENG120 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him if you want an engaging English class with and meaningful discussion, but expect reading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational writing teacherLenient graderFun discussionsReading and essaysCaring feedback
  • Most students describe Montana as funny, caring, and genuinely inspiring.
  • Grades are usually forgiving if students show up, read, participate, and .
  • The main drawbacks , and a few complaints about bias or structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable for students who attend, participate, read, and finish essays, though it is not always effortless.

The easy-A evidence , while the only online review reports an A+ but also high difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The class is usually manageable and enjoyable, but , and abstract writing can make students think.

, while the single online review praises the experience without proving the content was easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation matter in many reviews, but students do not describe a .

In-person reviews mention showing up and participating often; the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because he makes , and grades fairly.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation evidence is much stronger in the 25 in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly say he is an easy or , and revisions.

Format shift

The lenient-grading pattern ; the online sample is too small to judge separately.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload centers on reading, essays, discussion, and reading.

Format shift

and essay work, while the lone online review does not clarify workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most reviews describe him as , and able to make writing enjoyable.

Format shift

The structure complaints, and the single online review is also very positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears dominated by essays, readings, participation, revisions, and a .

Format shift

and reading; the online review gives no detailed assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews , and forgiving grading.

Main concern

Some students found him abstract, disorganized, biased, or lecture-heavy.

What students said

“Show up on time, do the . Simple.”
ENG124
“Great teacher! I learned a lot in this class and became a better writer.”
ENG120
“if .”
ENGLISH120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is highly positive but describes a difficult yet inspiring writing experience.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online-specific conclusions are limited.

What students said

“ .”
C082821
“he really helped all the students expand their mind and inspire!”
C082821

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly discuss essays and reading, and they as open-book, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book exams.

Essay-Based AssessmentIn-Class Final MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final but do not clearly prove the .

EssaysFinal Mentioned
“There's 4 essays, a .”
ENG124
“The class was moderate. 5 essays (final in class), lots of reading (seriously though), .”
ENG124

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up on time, do the . Simple.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Great teacher! I learned a lot in this class and became a better writer.”

📈 Grade Value

88/100

“if you put a little bit of effort, you'll pass the class with an A!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ and you will learn many things and if you put a little bit of effort, you'll pass the class with an A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are always thorough and interactive!
  • He made the class fun, and very chill.
  • he made the class fun to attend.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Show up on time, do the . Simple.
  • Be prepare to read.
  • There's 4 essays, a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • if .
  • totally bias, right winged, brain washing is all you will get from his class
  • He may not clear about what exactly he's expecting for the papers, but ask him & he will clarify.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 26 reviews across many years with consistent praise and , and teaching patterns.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1249 reviews
ENG1206 reviews
ENG1102 reviews
ENGL1242 reviews
ENGLISH1202 reviews
Show 4 more courses
POSC1212 reviews
C0828211 review
ENG12751 review
POLSCI1211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1