AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Business Technology

Hadar Ikzir

BOT121 · BOT128 · BOT100 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and learn independently when support is limited.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStraightforward workCanvas setup issuesSoftware frustrationMixed responsivenessHomework and tests
  • The course work is often described as straightforward, but teaching support is inconsistent.
  • Online reviews conflict sharply, with one student praising help and another criticizing communication and setup.
  • The in-person review reports serious frustration with required software problems being dismissed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

The work seems passable and two reported grades are A or A+, but support problems and .

Online evidence includes both an A+ and setup complaints, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students describe the class work as straightforward and easy to complete, with difficulty coming more from logistics than concepts.

Both online and in-person reviews call the work straightforward, but online setup and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One online tag says skipping class means you will not pass, and no .

The attendance concern comes from an online tag; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Two of because of poor setup, weak responsiveness, or dismissed software issues.

Online recommendation is split, while the grade.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Reported grades are high and appears in one online tag, but .

Format shift

Online evidence suggests and an A+ is possible; the .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work is called straightforward, but one online review flags lots of homework and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Online reviews show both straightforward work and , while the in-person review focuses more on software issues than workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Students report friendliness in one review, but the dominant , and dismissed technical issues.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed, and the .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and graded-by-few-things tags, suggesting a mix of assignments and tests.

Format shift

, and ; the in-person review does not clearly describe assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review says the class is easy but the professor dismissed software problems.

Main concern

Required software issues may not receive enough instructor support.

What students said

“The class itself is straight forward and easy to complete.”
BOT128
“Professor dismisses what issues we have with SNAP”
BOT128

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between a friendly, passable class and a .

Main concern

, and response time may be unreliable online.

What students said

“Work is straight forward, has responded to 1 message.”
BOT121
“the dates of work due do not match”
BOT121
“she is very friendly and help you any time you want”
BOT100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam rules, open-book policy, or .

Test Heavy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews include a test-heavy tag but do not clearly prove .

Test Heavy Mentioned
“TEST HEAVY”
BOT100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class itself is straight forward and easy to complete.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in organization, support, and grade effort. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Professor dismisses what issues we have with SNAP”

📈 Grade Value

65/100

“I pass the class with A+ grade .It think you can pass the class.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“the dates of work due do not match”

Theme 1

🧭 About Organization

  • the dates of work due do not match
  • once you click an .
  • Maybe .

Theme 2

📚 About Work & Grades

  • Work is straight forward, has responded to 1 message.
  • The class itself is straight forward and easy to complete.
  • I pass the class with A+ grade .It think you can pass the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • Professor dismisses what issues we have with SNAP
  • doesn't address the class with these issues
  • she is very friendly and help you any time you want

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews exist, opinions conflict, and exam and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BOT1001 review
BOT1211 review
BOT1281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values