AI Rate Professor

Art

Xuchi Eggleton

ART120 · ART145 · ART100 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if and , and tolerate inconsistent structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful FeedbackExtra CreditUnorganizedMixed GradingReading And Writing Heavy
  • , and .
  • The A is often reachable, especially online, but grading and organization are inconsistent.
  • Negative , and changing assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is very possible through , redos, and steady work, but some students report and discussions.

Online reviews make the A sound easier through redos and , while in-person reviews are more divided and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material is accessible for many students, but , and changing requirements can raise the difficulty.

Online content is often described as straightforward, while and unclear expectations make the experience harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Participation appears important in some sections, but reviews do .

Online evidence focuses on schedules and assignments, while and comments suggest participation matters more.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and , but the mixed organization and grading complaints create real risk.

Online students recommend her more strongly than in-person students, whose reviews include the sharpest warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grading is mixed because she offers redos and but some students call her a .

Format shift

Online grading looks more forgiving, while as strict or inconsistent.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload ranges from , and projects.

Format shift

Online workload is often manageable but can be compressed in summer, while , and supplies.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most and passion, but repeated organization complaints keep the teaching score below excellent.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades appear driven mainly , and assignments rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, discussions, and homework, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more mixed, praising passion and support but , and supplies.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ , but she grades super hard on the discussion and written summary.”
ART100
“I've taken 2 different courses with xuchi. i guess she means well but .”
ART145
“It was very demanding, however she does offer a LOT of , which is how I pulled the an A off”
ART100

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly positive and , and redo opportunities.

Main concern

One and many assignments.

What students said

“She lets you turn in late work all semester long and allows for re-do's.”
ART100
“Lots of opportunities 4. Easy A”
ART100
“This class was difficult as you need to really study the art and artists within the text although she offers so many opportunities”
ART100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and tests mentioned but no clearly proven proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Easy TestsChapter QuizzesMidterm And Final MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

57/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but reviews do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Easy TestsMidtermFinal ExamUnclear Test Scope
“ , but she grades super hard on the discussion and written summary.”
ART100
“ .”
ART100
“The .”
ART100

Online

Online evidence mentions weekly chapter quizzes and tests, but reviews do not clearly .

Chapter QuizzesMultiple ChoiceTrue Or False
“1.1 Chapter quiz per week. They're really easy. Multiple choice and T/F”
ART100
“I received A's and B's on the test but as well as the .”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She lets you turn in late work all semester long and allows for re-do's.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“I really liked the comments she gave about my work, they helped me.”

⚖️

62/100

“She lets you turn in late work all semester long and allows for re-do's.”

📚 Workload Reality

50/100

“A lot of reading and writing, but I learned a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Eggleton was very helpful and .
  • She was a sweetheart, and she's very knowledgeable and passionate about art.
  • I loved Xuchi and her attitude. She always tried to get our class into the projects.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Lots of opportunities 4. Easy A
  • , but she grades super hard on the discussion and written summary.
  • It was very demanding, however she does offer a LOT of , which is how I pulled the an A off

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • She covered a ton of material for one test, but never knew what it would be on.
  • I've taken 2 different courses with xuchi. i guess she means well but .
  • The downside to her class is that she always changes things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across both formats provide detailed and varied evidence, with consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART10013 reviews
ART1203 reviews
ART1453 reviews
1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 7 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values