AI Rate Professor

History

Susan Habor

HIST101 · HIST110 · HIST0967 · HIST108 · HIST109 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her only if you can handle a and frequent deadlines.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough graderLots of readingOrganized but demandingNot beginner friendly
  • Most reviews describe a demanding history course with , and writing assignments.
  • as tough, though may help late in the semester.
  • A few students value her organization, but many describe the class as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible for organized students, but the , and writing demands make it effort-heavy.

The online review mentions , while and strict expectations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is not always conceptually impossible, but the , and .

Both formats point to difficulty, with , tests, and writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews focus on deadlines and workload rather than a .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most students do not recommend her because the workload and .

The single online review is negative, and strong recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple students call her a , and some say written work rarely meets requirements despite effort.

Format shift

Online evidence directly says tough grader, while and hard-to-satisfy writing.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of reading, quizzes, tests, posts, and writing that .

Format shift

, while the online review gives less workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A minority praise her organization, but , and an unpleasant learning experience.

Format shift

In-person evidence is mixed but mostly negative, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and writing assignments rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details, while the and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and tests, extensive writing, and confusing expectations.

Main concern

The workload can feel excessive and confusing.

What students said

“A 3 unit class should not require 20 hours a week of work.”
HIST108
“Way too time consuming.”
HIST110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review says she is a but offers lots of near the end.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She is a but towards the end of the semester, she gives lots of .”
HIST109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

QuizzesTestsWriting AssignmentsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

QuizzesTestsExams
“there is still a lot of quizzes, 4 tests, and a couple of writing assignments.”
HIST109
“She required 13 quizes 4 exams and 4 post a week, and .”
HIST0967

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A 3 unit class should not require 20 hours a week of work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“Way too time consuming.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is a but towards the end of the semester, she gives lots of .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She posts far too much information that .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • This summer course was very demanding, lots of reading and deadlines.
  • A 3 unit class should not require 20 hours a week of work.
  • Way too time consuming.
  • She required 13 quizes 4 exams and 4 post a week, and .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades & Expectations

  • She is a but towards the end of the semester, she gives lots of .
  • and time.
  • Written work never really satisfied the requirements.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Class Experience

  • I think and every thing is usually due on Sunday at 11:59 pm.
  • no one ever knew what was going on.
  • .(horrible)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews over many years show consistent workload and , though some reviews are old and format labels conflict with comment wording.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST1083 reviews
HIST1093 reviews
HIST09671 review
HIST1011 review
HIST1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values