AI Rate Professor

English

Audrey Lapointe

ENGLISH122 · ENG122 · ENG5316 · ENG109 · ENG098 · ENG124 · ENG120 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you need an easy or forgiving English class, but consider her only if you want a demanding writing challenge.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkChallengingGood FeedbackPolarizing
  • Most students describe her as extremely hard, strict, and risky for grades.
  • Positive reviews say strong, focused writers can improve and .
  • The single online review is positive, while and often negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

An A is possible for strong writers, but repeated comments , and a high risk of poor grades.

The online review reports an A with challenge, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content and writing expectations are challenging, especially for .

Online evidence is positive but still challenging, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several in-person tags say skipping class means you will .

; the online review does not clearly address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and frustrating teaching experiences.

The lone online review recommends her, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or , and grammar.

Format shift

Online grading is described more favorably, but .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and preparation.

Format shift

Both formats require work, but the heavy-workload pattern is strongest in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

39/100

Some students praise her feedback and rigor, but many describe her as .

Format shift

The online review is positive, while and often negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and some test-heavy experiences.

Format shift

The online review lists essays, quizzes, discussions, and a , while and lecture-heavy work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative or mixed, with , and vague expectations.

Main concern

Students repeatedly warn that grades are hard to earn and the workload is heavy.

What students said

“You want a good grade? .”
ENG120
“This class has a lot of homework.”
ENG120
“She honestly made my English skills so much better”
ENG120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is positive and describes the class as challenging, informative, and supportive.

Main concern

The online class still required reading and discussion.

What students said

“I was not good at any English class before this and found if very challenging and informative.”
ENG122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears to vary by course, with essays, quizzes, pop quizzes, tests, and a but .

QuizzesFinal Course PaperPop QuizzesTests MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyPop Quizzes
“She is terrible. !”
ENG109

Online

The , and a final course paper, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policy.

Short EssaysQuizzesDiscussion BoardsFinal Course Paper
“it was and discussion boards, and a .”
ENG124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a good English . You will not learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

18/100

“ . She usually not clear about what content she wants to see in a paper.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“This class has a lot of homework.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

39/100

“She honestly made my English skills so much better, the comments stated before come from people who expect an easy ride.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

34/100

“ . stay away from such teachers. in you will fail this class.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • .
  • She grades sometimes harsh but gives good feed back.
  • she is one though grader.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This class has a lot of homework.
  • She is strict and gives out lots of homework and essays.
  • Be prepared with the materials and and ready on time.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The , and feedback.
  • Extremely hard. ; she is tough and too vague.
  • I took her class and I learned so much!

Theme 4

🚨 Student Warnings

  • She is terrible. !
  • !
  • please do yourslef a favor and take another teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 23 reviews across many years with , and workload.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG12010 reviews
ENG0984 reviews
ENG1094 reviews
86321 review
ENG1221 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG1241 review
ENG53161 review
ENGLISH1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3