AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Religious Studies

Bruce McGraw

HUM155 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and extensive assignments with little feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homeworkPoor feedbackUnclear gradingReading-heavyFrustrating assignments
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • Grading is criticized as .
  • The course appears difficult because expectations are vague and work volume is high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks difficult because the workload is extensive and .

All evidence comes from one online review because there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The intellectual challenge is worsened by boring readings, vague expectations, and .

All evidence comes from one online review because there are no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly mention attendance rules or meeting requirements.

The only evidence is online, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student review is strongly negative because of , and .

The only recommendation evidence is from one online review, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The and based on word count rather than content, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The and tags the course as lots of homework and reading-heavy.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from one online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review describes poor , and frustrating assignments.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The , and open-ended questions rather than exams.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review , and minimal feedback.

Main concern

Students may struggle to know what the professor wants because feedback and .

What students said

“The and extensive.”
HUM155
“ and it's incredibly difficult to give him what he is looking for as he just says "not enough explanation" on open-ended questions.”
HUM155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review discusses homework and open-ended questions but .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and extensive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and teaching experience. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Workload

10/100

“The and extensive.”

📝

15/100

“ and it's incredibly difficult to give him what he is looking for as he just says "not enough explanation" on open-ended questions.”

🎯 Teaching Experience

10/100

“The and uneventful.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • The and extensive.
  • The and uneventful.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and it's incredibly difficult to give him what he is looking for as he just says "not enough explanation" on open-ended questions.
  • He grades based on number of words, not content, so just fluff it up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on a single online review, even though that review is detailed and strongly negative.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUM1551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values