AI Rate Professor

Real Estate

Susan Yepiz

RE194 · RE201 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent organization and will double-check course details yourself.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessible OnlineInconsistent OrganizationTough but FairLow Email Support
  • Online feedback is very positive, but .
  • Students report syllabus changes, mistakes, and weak availability in in-person classes.
  • Grades can be good, but the course requires attention and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades appear possible, but , and checking the syllabus as necessary costs.

Online evidence suggests an easier path, while and uncertainty.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is manageable but can require close attention and covers a lot of details.

Online feedback does not stress content difficulty, while and lots of material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person review says attendance to every class is required, with .

; the online review does not address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students are split because strong online support is outweighed by in-person complaints about trust, organization, and help.

The online review strongly recommends her, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Reported grades are mostly strong, but comments .

Format shift

Online and in-person grades are good, but as tough but fair.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The , and weekly discussion-board work.

Format shift

Workload concerns appear in in-person reviews, while the online review gives no workload details.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching is polarized, with one strong online review and multiple in-person complaints about mistakes and support.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised, while and sometimes viewed as unhelpful.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and weekly discussion boards without a single dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Assessment details mainly come from in-person reviews, with little online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but repeated concerns about mistakes, attendance demands, syllabus changes, and weak support.

Main concern

Organization and availability are the main risks.

What students said

“She makes mistakes on syllabus, .”
RE194
“This class requires a lot of attention and .”
RE194

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review praises her accessibility, respect, and support.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited to one very positive review.

What students said

“ if we had any questions and willing to meet up with students”
RE201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams but do not clearly .

Exam Details UnclearSyllabus Changes Reported

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mistakes but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Exam Details UnclearMistakes on Exams Reported
“She makes mistakes on syllabus, .”
RE194

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes mistakes on syllabus, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting format differences in teaching, support, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Lots of .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“She changes the syllabus without notice.”

👍 Online Support

75/100

“ if we had any questions and willing to meet up with students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lots of .
  • She's one of the smartest teachers out there and very respected.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization

  • She makes mistakes on syllabus, .
  • She changes the syllabus without notice.

Theme 3

📌

  • This class requires a lot of attention and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across several years show a consistent format split, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

RE1943 reviews
RE2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values