AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sarah Rodriguez

MATH160 · MATH123 · MATH180 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle some toughness, but be cautious with statistics.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentTough graderTest review alignedStatistics risk
  • Reviews are sharply split between strong praise in MATH123 and MATH180 and severe warnings in MATH160.
  • Students and effective, but early organization and course preparation were inconsistent.
  • A grades appear possible, but grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two reported A-range grades show an A is possible, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content sounds manageable in some sections but statistics was described as poorly taught and hard to pass.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students either strongly recommend her caring teaching or strongly warn against taking her, depending on the course.

The recommendation and is highly split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tags and comments include tough grading, though review sheets may limit what appears on some tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Worksheets, lengthy study guides, and of overload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is praised as caring and effective in some courses but criticized as unprepared and ineffective in statistics.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Students emphasize quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

caring teaching and strong criticism of statistics preparation.

Main concern

Students report inconsistent organization and .

What students said

“Her lectures are short but effective and she gives worksheets for .”
MATH180
“Quizzes and .”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard but uneven, with and another saying tests include untaught material.

Review Sheet Based TestsWeekly QuizzesUnclear Test Alignment

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in calculus but test-alignment complaints in statistics.

Review Sheet Based TestsWeekly QuizzesUnclear Test Alignment
“she wont ever test you on something that isnt on the review sheet.”
MATH180
“ .”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Her lectures are short but effective and she gives worksheets for .”

⚖️

35/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

55/100

“If ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She truly cares about her students.
  • Not good at teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Is it tough for a community college? Yes.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Tests

  • she wont ever test you on something that isnt on the review sheet.
  • Quizzes and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews give useful but limited evidence, and opinions vary strongly by course.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1602 reviews
MATH1231 review
MATH1801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values