AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Mathematics

Lawrence Terbell

MATH176 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and do not need a flashy lecture style.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient problem solvingClear grading criteriaCaringEnthusiastic but dryFlexible class policies
  • Students describe him as patient and willing to review every question until the class understands.
  • and class policies are relaxed.
  • His lecture style can feel dry or awkward, so students wanting high energy may be less satisfied.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

The course does not sound like a free A, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math content appears manageable because he works through questions carefully, though the course still requires attention.

Only in-person comments discuss difficulty, and they emphasize support more than content hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Reviews mention relaxed classroom policies, but they do .

All format evidence is in person, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and committed to helping everyone understand.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and helpful review support suggest fair-to-lenient .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Reviews , but they also do not prove the workload is especially light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students describe him as patient, enthusiastic about teaching, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention grading criteria and practice questions but as dominant.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, and details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and flexible classroom policies, with only mild concern about dry delivery.

Main concern

His lecture style may feel dry or awkward for students who need high energy.

What students said

“He will literally go over every single question to make sure everyone understands.”
MATH176
“he's somewhat of a "dry" lecturer so if you're into energetic people, he isn't for you.”
MATH176

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will literally go over every single question to make sure everyone understands.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“He will literally go over every single question to make sure everyone understands.”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“ . 10/10”

⚖️

78/100

“ , but he's okay in terms of policies”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will literally go over every single question to make sure everyone understands.
  • he's somewhat of a "dry" lecturer so if you're into energetic people, he isn't for you.

Theme 2

📋 About Policies

  • you can eat in class, drink beverages, go on your phone etc
  • I found it beneficial in case of personal issues I was able to stay on top of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and specific enough to support a moderate-confidence read.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1762 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values