AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Guillermo Alvarez

MATH160 · MATH176 · MATH104 · MATHST160 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a demanding in-person math class and are ready for , and consistent attendance.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyStrict DeadlinesClear ExamplesAttendance Matters
  • Student opinion is and major frustration with .
  • Recent reviews are much , and clarity.
  • Success depends heavily , and tolerating a strict math environment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but , and significant required work.

All evidence is from in-person math courses, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course content is demanding math, and several students say tests include difficult material barely covered beforehand.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it consistently frames the courses as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews say skipping class will hurt or prevent passing, and he is not flexible with missed work.

and deadline expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Some students praise his examples and helpfulness, but many warn against him because of and strict policies.

and highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students frequently call him a and note strict expectations for deadlines, neatness, and tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is heavy because reviews mention lots of , and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He can explain math well with examples, but accent, strictness, and students.

Format shift

and serious complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly emphasize tests, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a strict, but leave others frustrated.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“The .”
MATH160
“he will answer any question you have”
MATH176
“ . Hes strict on deadlines so good luck asking for .”
MATHST160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because and an insanely difficult final, but reviews do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or software rules.

Hard FinalChallenging TestsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a high-stakes final without clearly proving open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Hard FinalChallenging TestsTest Heavy
“The .”
MATH160
“ ”
MATHST160
“the final is 1/4 of overall grade”
MATH176

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and policies. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

25/100

“he is a ”

🧪

28/100

“The .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Split

55/100

“He gives many good examples and will teach you everything the book doesn't.”

Theme 1

📉 About Tests and Grades

  • difficult thing he could find
  • the final is 1/4 of overall grade

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he will teach you until he knows till you understand
  • gives a lot of real life examples so and explained well
  • he will answer any question you have

Theme 3

⚠️ About Policies

  • not flexible whatsoever
  • Hes strict on deadlines so good luck asking for
  • he doesnt let anyone out early, he doesnt miss class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen in-person reviews across many years provide rich detail, though older positive reviews partly conflict with newer negative ones.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH17611 reviews
MATHST1603 reviews
MATH1602 reviews
MATH1041 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values