AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Guillermo Colls

2A · E5348 · ESL120 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are comfortable with a polarizing instructor and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough graderClear for some studentsCaring in positive reviewsTest heavy
  • Reviews are highly split, with and caring while others say he teaches poorly.
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and and test-heavy classes.
  • Student outcomes vary widely, including A-level grades and failing grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Grades are not easy because multiple students report , and even failing outcomes.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

, but several students say lectures are poor and grading makes the course hard to pass.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on the course and student fit because reviews range .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Several students directly call him a tough or , and low grades appear in the review set.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not described in detail, but test-heavy and lecture-heavy tags suggest steady academic pressure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

and care offset by recent complaints about poor lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Recent reviews repeatedly tag the class as test heavy and graded by few things.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with and caring teaching while recent reviews report poor teaching and .

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent teaching experience and .

What students said

“He is a , and didn't teach the lectures well”
E5348
“ in explaining the materials”
2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews indicate a , but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove specific exam rules or proctoring.

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things
“Did not teach well!”
2A
“I did not enjoy his class at all! He is a , and didn't teach the lectures well”
E5348

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ in explaining the materials, and prepares you for the next level with a strong and solid base.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“ in explaining the materials, and prepares you for the next level with a strong and solid base.”

⚖️

25/100

“He is a , and didn't teach the lectures well”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“He is amazing. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and .
  • Did not teach well!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a , and didn't teach the lectures well
  • when comes to grade, he is very niggard.
  • so if you guys want to pass the class and understand the

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Respect each single student's personality and culture.
  • Always energetic when teaching.
  • He is willing to help everyone ask him for help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

and include detailed but sharply conflicting student experiences.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESL1203 reviews
2A2 reviews
E53482 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1