Eckert Phillip

MATH176 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 48/100
RMP rating: 3.0/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 4.0

The decision

Consider him only if you are comfortable with limited evidence and can handle a harder online math class independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague feedbackModerate teachingHard courseOnline only

Only one , so confidence is low.
The , but the comment is lukewarm.
The difficulty rating is high, with no detail explaining why.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The high difficulty rating suggests an A likely requires real effort, and no easy-grade evidence is given.

The only evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course appears challenging based on the difficulty rating, but the comment gives no content detail.

Only , so format comparison is not possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

, and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

The , but the actual comment is only mildly positive.

Recommendation evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, so the hard difficulty rating keeps leniency below average.

Format shift

Only one online review exists, and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload cannot be verified, but the high difficulty rating suggests the class is not light.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with no workload details.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

The only comment says he was alright, which supports an average but not strong teaching rating.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is limited to one vague online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

There is no assessment detail from either format beyond one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says he was acceptable but gives almost no details.

Main concern

The evidence is too .

What students said

“Yeah he was alright”
MATH176

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Yeah he was alright”
Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Yeah he was alright”

👍 Recommendation Signal

55/100

“Yeah he was alright”

⚠️ Evidence Depth

22/100

“Yeah he was alright”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Yeah he was alright

Theme 2

📉 About Evidence Quality

Yeah he was alright

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short review exists, and it lacks .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 51

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values