AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katherine Naimark

MATH160 · MATH96 · MATH096 · MATH60 · MATH1609253 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are willing to attend consistently, ask for help, and tolerate a mixed teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing TeachingTough GraderFast LecturesCaring HelpParticipation Matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who praise her personal help and .
  • Grades can be helped by dropped grades or , but tests, quizzes, and .
  • Attendance and participation appear important because several students say skipping class will hurt performance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earned A-range grades and mention dropped grades or , but , and heavy effort make the A far from automatic.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content feels challenging because students cite fast lectures, , and difficulty for math-weaker students.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as formally mandatory, but participation matters and skipping class is repeatedly linked to not passing.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students call her the while others strongly suggest taking someone else.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grading has helpful elements like a dropped lowest grade and , but tough-grader complaints and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention lots of , and the need to do all the work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Her teaching is inconsistent, with strong praise for , and mistakes.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, homework, group work, participation, and rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a very polarizing math and helpful but , and strict.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and .

What students said

“She will come in early or stay late if you need extra help.”
MATH160
“She doesnt have a and and quizzes with no clear reasoning or explanation as to why.”
MATH096
“The professor lectures very fast, and I found her a bit impatient with those of us who needed help.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to standard tests and quizzes with some helpful policies but .

TestsPop QuizzesFormulas Provided In One CourseDropped Lowest Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one course where formulas were provided, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

TestsPop QuizzesFormulas Provided
“ the semester which is very helpful to increase your grade.”
MATH60
“She provides the formulas for the test problems and then teaches you to use the information to plug in those formulas.”
MATH1609253
“ and quizzes with no clear reasoning or explanation as to why.”
MATH096

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Naimark is truly a wonderful professor, that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

54/100

“She really takes the time to make sure you understand the material and WHY it's important to know it.”

48/100

“She doesnt have a and and quizzes with no clear reasoning or explanation as to why.”

Difficulty And Effort

35/100

“This class is not easy .The professor lectures very fast, and I found her a bit impatient with those of us who needed help.”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • Naimark is the .
  • Professor Naimark will leave you more confused about stats than before you started.
  • Teacher? She just makes you do a problem over and over again until you're forced to memorize the action of doing the problem, rather than actually knowing how to do it.

Theme 2

About Grades And Work

  • the semester which is very helpful to increase your grade.
  • There are chances so .
  • There is no , so do all the work!

Theme 3

About Support

  • She will go above and beyond to help you and make sure you understand.
  • She took many hours of personal time to help me with the basic skills that I lacked to enable me to understand the course curriculum and content.
  • She is always there to guide and assist you in whatever you need a little extra help with.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed in-person reviews across multiple math courses give a consistent but polarized picture.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1603 reviews
MATH0962 reviews
MATH16092531 review
MATH601 review
MATH961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values