AI Rate Professor

History

Natalye Pass

HIST101 · HIS101 · HIST109 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because support appears weak.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat In PersonPoor Online SupportExtra Credit HeavyPaper BasedNo Exams Mentioned
  • In-person students strongly praise her teaching, clarity, interaction, and generous .
  • Online reviews are sharply negative, citing poor help, no second chances, and limited availability.
  • The class can be grade-friendly in person, but the online format creates a much higher risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

In-person sections look very grade-friendly because of and , but online students report strict penalties and poor help.

Online reviews are harsh about second chances, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is described as interesting and clearly explained, though paper volume and online independence add effort.

evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One online review flags participation and skipping as serious risks, while rules.

Online comments mention participation risk, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

but online students report poor support and strict no-second-chance grading.

positive in person and negative online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

, while online reviews call her a tough grader with few chances to recover.

Format shift

, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but HIST101 required ten papers and online work included rentals or streaming access.

Format shift

In-person workload varies by course, and online reviews mention .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Her in-person teaching is praised as clear and engaging, but online students describe her as unavailable and unhelpful.

Format shift

Teaching quality is high in person and low online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and no exams rather than exam-heavy grading.

Format shift

and quizzes than traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students describe her as , and .

Main concern

The main workload concern is paper writing, especially in HIST101.

What students said

“Literally... the !”
HIST109
“ .”
HIST101
“We had to write 10 papers in total during the semester.”
HIST101
“ and I can honestly say that I actually LEARNED in her class.”
HIS101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report poor , and few second chances despite some .

Main concern

Online students may need to solve problems independently because help is described as limited.

What students said

“unavailable for any questions, comments, concerns the whole time”
HIST109
“She does not give second chances so if your screw up on anything.... GOODLUCK”
HIST109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because in-person reviews explicitly mention no in-class final and no exams, while .

No In-Class FinalNo Exams MentionedStudy Guides Match Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

no exams, making exam risk low in that format.

No In-Class FinalNo Exams MentionedStudy Guides Match Quizzes
“there is no in class final”
HIST109
“Her study guides are copies of the quizzes”
HIST109
“ .”
HIST101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and I can honestly say that I actually LEARNED in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting the strong split between online and in-person experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Format Split

62/100

“unavailable for any questions, comments, concerns the whole time”

👍 In-Person Recommendation

58/100

“ .”

⚖️

64/100

“she gave my class up to 30 pts of EC i went from an 80 to a 97 in the class because of it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a great teacher.
  • and I can honestly say that I actually LEARNED in her class.
  • Professor Pass was a wonderful teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • paper but there is no in class final
  • She's not a As
  • She allows which is cool

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Risk

  • Also very unhelpful so if you mess up GOOD LUCK.
  • She does not give second chances so if your screw up on anything.... GOODLUCK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The five reviews include both formats and detailed comments, but the evidence is older and split sharply by format.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST1093 reviews
HIS1011 review
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values