AI Rate Professor

English

Candace Boeck

ENG98 · ENGL98 · ENG111 · ENGL110 · ENGL120 · ENG110 · ENG098 · ENG124 · ENG120 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and accept dull lectures, heavy writing, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesHarsh Essay GradingLots Of PapersPoor FeedbackRude Tone
  • Most reviews describe boring, monotone, textbook-driven teaching with little learning value.
  • Students repeatedly report lots of papers and hard-to-earn A .
  • The strongest advice unless no alternative exists.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students call some sections easy, but and workload is paper-heavy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The content is often described as basic or textbook-based, but poor teaching and make the experience harder.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and comments suggest skipping class can hurt passing, even though students often see little learning value in attending.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because they describe poor teaching, rude treatment, boring lectures, and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

as hard, with students saying A grades are very difficult to earn.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and lab work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Most comments describe monotone , and low learning value.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and lab assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and harsh grading.

Main concern

Students most often complain that they learn little while .

What students said

“This is the .”
ENG120
“this teacher refuses to give As on essays”
ENG124
“Plan on tons of pointless work.”
ENG111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rules, or whether exams are open-book or closed-book.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She teaches straight from the book. She has no enthusiasm.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

⚖️

22/100

“this teacher refuses to give As on essays”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • boring. monotone. .
  • She teaches straight from the book.
  • She has ZERO personality and made it painful to sit through one of her lectures.
  • and uninteresting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this teacher refuses to give As on essays
  • It really doesn't matter if you were the ; you would still get a B in her class and .
  • ; something I did not expect from her.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • . and .
  • Plan on tons of pointless work.
  • it was a lot of work and lots of reading!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 26 reviews across many years with consistent themes about teaching, workload, and grading.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1119 reviews
ENG1104 reviews
ENG1203 reviews
ENG983 reviews
ENG0982 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG1242 reviews
ENGL1101 review
ENGL1201 review
ENGL981 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2