AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Keith Sherer

MATH110 · MATH160060 · MATH180 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a and are willing to participate and ask for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulClear ExplanationsAccessibleActive LearningNot Easy
  • Students consistently describe Sherer as kind, reachable, and willing to help.
  • His classes can feel unusual or flipped, with group work and in-class assistance replacing traditional lectures.
  • The course is not easy, but students who seek help and participate tend to do well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Passing and strong grades look reachable with help and participation, but students clearly say the class is not easy.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is manageable with support, but flipped structure and math workload add real challenge.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they describe moderate to high challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation matter because class work, group activity, and help sessions are central to success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and respectful.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Clear grading criteria and are mentioned, but there is not enough evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is active and sometimes difficult, but support in class makes it manageable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly praise his clear explanations, accessibility, patience, and willingness to help.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and in-class assistance more than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

active-learning format rewards participation and persistence.

Main concern

Some students may struggle with the flipped or group-work format instead of standard lectures.

What students said

“He is a nice teacher and is always willing to help students in need of help.”
MATH180
“He did a great job explaining the materials very clearly.”
MATH110
“Definitely not easy!”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation, while exam policy is not clearly proven.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everyone that seeks help regularly is passing the class it seems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, format, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He did a great job explaining the materials very clearly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ and if he were teaching other classes I needed.”

📚 Course Effort

62/100

“Definitely not easy!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he does a good job explaining what I need help on.
  • He did a great job explaining the materials very clearly.
  • so clearly more than many other teachers that I know.

Theme 2

🤝 About Support

  • always willing to help students in need of help.
  • the teacher is reachable and works hard to reach to all of us.
  • he answers any question that we have.

Theme 3

📘 About Class Format

  • This was my first experience of being involved in a flip course class
  • there was group work and not so .
  • Instead of lectures we work together and get .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews are consistent about his helpfulness and the active-learning format.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1103 reviews
MATH1803 reviews
MATH1600601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1