AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Judith Phillips

PSY150 · PSY1651 · PSY120 · PSYCH120 · PSYCH134 · PSYCH165 · PSY165 · HUM121 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can stay current with reading and assignments, but expect detailed expectations and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful And ResponsiveEasy If You Keep UpReading HeavyFair But Sometimes HarshOnline Friendly
  • Most students describe her as , and .
  • The course is usually manageable, but students must keep up with , and written work.
  • A minority report harsh feedback or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Students often say the class is easy if they keep up, but reading, quizzes, writing, and .

Online evidence mentions open-book quizzes and closed-book tests, while easy if kept current.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is generally described as not hard, though and fast paced.

Both formats describe manageable content, with online reviews stressing reading and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent attendance policy, though one .

Online reviews , while one in-person-labeled review mentions attending three times for tests.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair when students keep up.

Online reviews are mixed but still include strong praise, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students call her fair and sometimes lenient, but .

Format shift

Online evidence includes harsh feedback despite full credit, while and GPA-risk warnings.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and written assignments, but students often say it is manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and discussion boards, while and assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews praise her responsiveness, organization, patience, and helpfulness, despite a few negative experiences.

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed on personality and feedback, while and clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, discussion boards, projects, reading, and .

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention quizzes, discussion boards, written assignments, and tests, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and often describe helpfulness, fairness, and easy work if students keep up.

Main concern

Some students report positive tone.

What students said

“She responds and over until you get it with extreme patience .”
PSYCH120
“easy if you keep up with .”
PSY165
“Lots of work but none of it hard.”
PSYCH165

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the class is manageable with open-book quizzes and discussion work, but .

Main concern

Students must keep up with reading and .

What students said

“Weekly open book, untimed quizzes, occasional , and .”
PSY150
“A lot of !”
PSY150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest evidence shows student-friendly open-book quizzes paired with closed-book tests and .

Open-Book Untimed QuizzesClosed-Book TestsIn-Person Test Meetings

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and three in-person test meetings, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Online QuizzesIn-Person Test MeetingsTests Mentioned
“Took online - had to attend 3 times in person for tests.”
PSY165
“ .”
PSY165
“her tests and .”
HUM121

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention weekly open-book untimed quizzes and closed-book tests, but .

Open-Book Untimed QuizzesClosed-Book Tests
“Weekly open book, untimed quizzes, occasional , and .”
PSY150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easy if you keep up with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She responds and over until you get it with extreme patience .”

📈 Effort For Grade

72/100

“class is easy if you put the effort!!”

⚖️

58/100

“I found her feedback on assignments to be unnecessarily harsh even when I received full credit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and considerate.
  • She is a wonderful teacher. and responds quickly to your questions.
  • Excellent class, I learned a lot. . Phillips.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of !
  • Lots of work but none of it hard.
  • easy if you keep up with .

Theme 3

🧪

  • Weekly open book, untimed quizzes, occasional , and .
  • Took online - had to attend 3 times in person for tests.
  • her tests and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years provide rich and mostly consistent evidence, though older dates reduce certainty slightly.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSY1653 reviews
PSY1502 reviews
PSYCH1652 reviews
HUM1211 review
PSY1201 review
Show 3 more courses
PSY16511 review
PSYCH1201 review
PSYCH1341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values