AI Rate Professor

Sign Language

Patty Walford

ASL299 · ASL126 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Patty Walford is a highly recommended choice for , and engaging ASL instruction.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate TeacherVery HelpfulFun ClassClear ExplanationsReal Experience
  • Every review gives the highest quality rating and describes a positive class experience.
  • Students praise her passion, clarity, helpfulness, and real ASL experience with children.
  • The course is engaging and rewarding, though not described as effortless.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A seems achievable with fair effort because students report fun learning and one A, but no one calls it a free or effortless grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course feels approachable because students call , and fun.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes ASL useful and enjoyable.

All and is strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Reported outcomes are positive, but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Students describe the class as fun and rewarding, with no major workload complaints.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the class experience.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise her helpfulness, passion, clarity, and practical ASL experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment structure is not clearly proven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and describe a fun, helpful, and practical ASL learning experience.

Main concern

The only minor concern is that the class may require normal effort rather than being automatic.

What students said

“She was amazing!! Very helpful.”
125
“She was easy to understand & had fun doing it.”
ASL299
“I learned so much from her and her team teaching partner.”
ASL299

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Walford is a great teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She was amazing!! Very helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ !”

📚 Learning Value

90/100

“I learned so much from her and her team teaching partner.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Passionate teacher!
  • She was easy to understand & had fun doing it.
  • Ms. Walford is a great teacher!

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She was amazing!! Very helpful.
  • She absolutely loves the subject and her experience with children and ASL is an asset to the classroom.
  • A bright spot in the ASL program

Theme 3

📚 About Learning Value

  • Taught me a lot about working with children and using ASL.
  • I learned so much from her and her team teaching partner.
  • I use my skills everyday!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews are fully consistent and detailed about teaching quality, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ASL2992 reviews
1251 review
ASL1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1