AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cheryl Vallejo

MATH88 · MATH160 · MATH103 · MATH120 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH1441 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you can learn math mostly on your own and have few other options.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesPoor Question SupportHeavy HomeworkSlow GradingAvoid for Stats
  • Most students describe unclear lectures and and higher math courses.
  • Several reviews say she does not answer questions effectively and can be rude or dismissive.
  • Homework and grading issues add stress, though a few .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A high grade is possible in some classes, but most comments describe confusion, heavy homework, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content feels harder because and students often leave confused about expectations.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Only , and there is no strong proof of a strict attendance penalty.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because and her help ineffective.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students mention tests and , and difficult courses, though one review reports an A+.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

One detailed review describes daily Math XL, book problems, and lab problems, while others describe the class as very difficult.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The dominant pattern is , weak explanations, poor question handling, and classroom management issues.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments , and medium or difficult tests, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about , weak classroom control, and poor help with questions.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear teaching that .

What students said

“I literally left class everyday with no idea what was taught.”
MATH160
“ .”
MATH160
“ ! !”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention medium or important tests but do .

Medium TestsTests Worth A LotNo Clear Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Medium TestsTests Worth A LotNo Clear Exam Policy
“ ”
MATH1441
“ !”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you enjoy learning and would like to do well in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“I literally left class everyday with no idea what was taught.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Around 50 lab problems and 30 books questions daily.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a good instructor honestly. .
  • She does not answer questions when asked by students.
  • She has absolutley no concept of how to teach and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This was the hardest class.
  • !

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • She also takes forever to grade anything.
  • If you ask for help, she'll either be extremely rude or try to help but not be successful at it.
  • No control over the class people talking over her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 in-person reviews include repeated, specific complaints across several math courses.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1604 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH14412 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
MATH1031 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1101 review
MATH881 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1