AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Chemistry

Laurie Le Blanc

CHEM120 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are already strong in chemistry and can handle a strict, intimidating classroom.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh classroom toneVery difficult chemistryStrict homework timingPoor student supportHigh dropout pressure
  • Students describe the class as extremely hard to keep up with.
  • The main complaint is a rude and intimidating teaching style.
  • and weak support make success difficult for beginners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because students report failing, harsh pacing, and little support unless they already know chemistry.

All grade and difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The chemistry course is described as very unless students already have strong chemistry skills.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Punctuality is strict because .

The and focuses on strict lateness rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because they describe her as rude, scary, unsupportive, and very hard to keep up with.

All and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Refusing late homework at all and an F .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students describe the course pace as very hard to keep up with and highly attritional.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students describe her as rude, scary, and more focused on her agenda than student success.

Format shift

and strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only clearly described , while exams are not explained.

Format shift

but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person reviews are strongly negative, citing harsh , and poor concern for student success.

Main concern

Students may struggle badly unless they already know chemistry well.

What students said

She is very hard to keep up with, she can be very rude and scary.
CHEM120
Unless you are already really good at chemistry you won't get far in her class.
CHEM120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

Unless you are already really good at chemistry you won't get far in her class.

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

Cares about her classagenda more than the success of her students.

📈 Difficulty & Grades

8/100

Unless you are already really good at chemistry you won't get far in her class.

⚖️

5/100

If you are not on time .

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very hard to keep up with, she can be very rude and scary.
  • She will yell at you for the smallest things.
  • Cares about her classagenda more than the success of her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I started in a class of 35 people and ended in a class of 7.
  • Unless you are already really good at chemistry you won't get far in her class.
  • If you are not on time .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only two old reviews, but both are consistent and one gives specific classroom details.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

1411 review
CHEM1201 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values