AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Edward Pieters

ART299 · ART175 · CIS · GD105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want creative freedom and industry perspective, but be ready to work independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCreative FreedomIndustry ExperienceLaid BackFun AssignmentsUneven Teaching
  • Students consistently describe the class as creative, fun, and relaxed.
  • Industry experience is a .
  • One detailed review warns that beginners may feel under-taught in GD105.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Low difficulty ratings and easy-class comments suggest an A is very reachable if .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The class feels easy and creative overall, but GD105 may be harder for students who need direct instruction.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show mostly easy courses with one beginner-support concern.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and industry knowledge, but one review strongly criticizes the teaching support.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Very low difficulty ratings and easy-class language suggest forgiving grading, though grades are not reported.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Reviews describe fun creative assignments and easy classes rather than heavy workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

73/100

Students value his industry experience and creative freedom, but teaching clarity is inconsistent.

Format shift

complaint about lack of instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on creative assignments and portfolio work, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

useful industry insight, though teaching structure can be weak for beginners.

Main concern

Some students may need more direct instruction than he provides.

What students said

“Very laid back teacher, allows a lot of creative freedom which in !”
ART175
“ , but useless if you don't already know everything he's SUPPOSED to teach.”
GD105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove whether exams exist or how they are administered.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or exam difficulty.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very laid back teacher, allows a lot of creative freedom which in ! !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in creativity, teaching, and industry value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎨 Creative Freedom

80/100

“Very laid back teacher, allows a lot of creative freedom which in !”

🏭 Industry Experience

73/100

“Has valuable industry experiences he is willing to share.”

⚠️ Teaching Gaps

45/100

“ as an instructor”

Theme 1

🎨 About Creative Freedom

  • Allows a lot of creative activity.
  • lets you be as creative and wild as you like.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Better than Cuyamaca-average in teaching abilities.
  • just gives a syllabus but doesn't teach anything from it.
  • as an instructor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews give consistent themes, but they are old and lack grade or .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GD1052 reviews
ART1751 review
ART2991 review
CIS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values