AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Engineering

Kendall Reyzer

PHYS151 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are prepared for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAvoid At All CostsDoes Not CareSuper Hard TestsDiscouraging
  • The only review describes the professor as uncaring toward students.
  • Tests are described as super hard and discouraging.
  • The student gives a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

The , so an A likely requires heavy effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Physics appears intellectually demanding and is .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

The .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Workload is not detailed, but the testing burden sounds high.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

The review says the professor does not care about students.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

The only assessment evidence centers on tests.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review is strongly negative, focused on low support and .

Main concern

The main concern is hard testing without enough student support.

What students said

“Gives super hard tests, which ends up discouraging students rather then interesting them in physics.”
PHYS151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because the only student evidence describes tests as super hard.

Super Hard Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not prove proctoring, book policy, or .

Super Hard Tests
“ ”
PHYS151

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Part time teacher, that does not care about students.”

📝

20/100

“Gives super hard tests, which ends up discouraging students rather then interesting them in physics.”

👍 Recommendation Level

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Part time teacher, that does not care about students.
  • .

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • Gives super hard tests, which ends up discouraging students rather then interesting them in physics.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on one old review.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHYS1511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values