AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Horticulture

Nick Delorenzo

OH275 · OH175 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Enroll only if you are comfortable with uncertainty and can handle a class that may depend heavily on your own judgment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed FeedbackFun Class PotentialFavoritism ConcernsWeak LecturesUnclear Grading
  • The two reviews strongly conflict, with and fun and the other describing severe teaching and .
  • The negative review raises major concerns about favoritism, poor lecture value, and inconsistent advice.
  • Evidence is thin, so confidence is low despite the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The limited evidence suggests moderate difficulty, but the complaint about losing points after following advice makes the path to an A uncertain.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course does not sound intellectually difficult, but content itself.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Recommendation is uncertain because one student found the class fun while another reported serious problems with lectures, fairness, and grading.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One detailed review says he took off points for following .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The reviews do not describe a heavy workload, but they also do not provide enough detail to call it light.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is mixed, but the detailed negative review says there was essentially no useful lecture and little learning.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The and grading, but the overall assessment structure is not well documented.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

review and a detailed negative review about teaching quality and grading fairness.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent guidance and .

What students said

“Helpful teacher and a fun class.”
OH275
“He plays favorites, he is anti-sustainability, he gives advice and .”
OH175

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams being graded but do not clearly .

Exam Grading MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams, so and policy are not clearly proven.

TA Graded ExamsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Nick allowed his TA to run him and grade the exams.”
OH175

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He plays favorites, he is anti-sustainability, he gives advice and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp split between a brief positive review and a detailed negative review; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“There was essentially no useful lecture, and nothing much was learned.”

⚖️

35/100

“he gives advice and .”

👍 Positive Signal

44/100

“Helpful teacher and a fun class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Helpful teacher and a fun class.
  • There was essentially no useful lecture, and nothing much was learned.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Fairness And Grading

  • He plays favorites, he is anti-sustainability, he gives advice and .
  • Nick allowed his TA to run him and grade the exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict sharply with limited detail in the positive review.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

OH1751 review
OH2751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values