AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Patrick Browder

ESL1607 · ESL106 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you can handle a demanding ESL class with inconsistent student experiences and a hard path to an A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingHard GraderHelpful to SomeUnorganized ComplaintsHard A
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him caring and students who found him unfair or unavailable.
  • Getting an A appears difficult, with and hard work.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent, with praise for personal help but serious criticism about organization and responsiveness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say the class is hard and that getting an A requires major effort or may feel unrealistic.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course is intellectually and practically challenging because , and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an , so flexibility cannot be proven.

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because strong praise is offset by , and lack of help.

All and is highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Several students explicitly call the hard to earn no matter how much they work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students describe needing to work hard for an A, though reviews .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Some students praise his care and humor, but several others describe him as ESL.

Format shift

Teaching and is strongly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize writing work, discussions, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, mixing strong praise for care and humor with and poor availability.

Main concern

and difficulty getting an A.

What students said

“no matter how hard you work, you will never get an A.”
ESL106
“ .”
ESL106
“He always said,"I am busy!"”
ESL106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or specific exam format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's not easy teacher. You need too work hard to get an A. Good luck.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 A Difficulty

28/100

“He's not easy teacher. You need too work hard to get an A. Good luck.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He is a and he cares about the students moe than other teachers.”

⚖️

18/100

“He is not fair in ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a and he cares about the students moe than other teachers.
  • He can be a good history teacher but not English.
  • he made the class boring, he is so unorganized and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no matter how hard you work, you will never get an A.
  • He's not easy teacher. You need too work hard to get an A. Good luck.
  • His class is a little hard, but good.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • .
  • He always takes time after class if you need help.
  • He has no time to help the students after class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 10 detailed in-person reviews, but opinions are polarized and several reviews are old.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESL1069 reviews
ESL16071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values