AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Horticulture

Lawrence Oleary

SOILS140 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you need structured teaching and , but treat the verdict cautiously because it is based on one review.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnfocused lecturesLimited subject knowledgeHard finalPoor course consistencyLow confidence
  • The only review says the class began acceptably but changed sharply after the .
  • The student reports limited subject knowledge, poor focus, and a .
  • Because there is only one review, conclusions should be treated as low-confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A likely requires extra independent preparation because the review says the .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course seems challenging mainly because instruction became unfocused and the .

All course difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The only student strongly criticizes the , and overall value.

All recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The as long, small-print, and filled with questions never discussed, suggesting strict or unfair assessment.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The review does not describe routine workload, but the and poorly aligned.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The review describes limited subject knowledge, lack of focus, and a course that changed negatively after the .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, so teaching conclusions have low confidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The only assessment evidence is about the details.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review describes unfocused teaching and a .

Main concern

The or clearly tied to the course.

What students said

“Very limited knowledge of subject.”
SOILS140
“The final was 5 pages, small print with off the wall questions”
SOILS140
“Waste of time.”
SOILS140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The as long, small-print, and filled with off-topic or undiscussed questions, making it student-unfriendly.

Long FinalSmall Print FinalOff-Topic QuestionsUndiscussed Material

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The print and many questions that were not discussed or relevant.

Long FinalSmall Print FinalOff-Topic QuestionsUndiscussed Material
“The final was 5 pages, small print with off the wall questions”
SOILS140
“alot of them were never discussed nor had any bearing on the subject.”
SOILS140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very limited knowledge of subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Very limited knowledge of subject.”

📝

25/100

“The final was 5 pages, small print with off the wall questions”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“Waste of time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very limited knowledge of subject.
  • He should be required to have lesson plan & stay focused on the subject.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • The final was 5 pages, small print with off the wall questions
  • alot of them were never discussed nor had any bearing on the subject.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Experience

  • First few weeks were fine, but .
  • Waste of time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is detailed but too limited for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOILS1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values